170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586207)
1. Computational Study of the Effect of Electrode Polarity on Neural Activation Related to Paresthesia Coverage in Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy.
Durá JL; Solanes C; De Andrés J; Saiz J
Neuromodulation; 2019 Apr; 22(3):269-279. PubMed ID: 30586207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Lead Position and Polarity on Paresthesia Coverage in Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy: A Computational Study.
Dura JL; Solanes C; De Andres J; Saiz J
Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):680-692. PubMed ID: 35131153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic pain: analysis of technical drawbacks and solutions.
Holsheimer J
Neurosurgery; 1997 May; 40(5):990-6; discussions 996-9. PubMed ID: 9149258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of anode-cathode configuration on paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation.
Holsheimer J; Wesselink WA
Neurosurgery; 1997 Sep; 41(3):654-9; discussion 659-60. PubMed ID: 9310984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D patient-specific spinal cord computational model for SCS management: potential clinical applications.
Solanes C; Durá JL; Ángeles Canós M; De Andrés J; Martí-Bonmatí L; Saiz J
J Neural Eng; 2021 Mar; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33556926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Staggered transverse tripoles with quadripolar lateral anodes using percutaneous and surgical leads in spinal cord stimulation.
Sankarasubramanian V; Buitenweg JR; Holsheimer J; Veltink PH
Neurosurgery; 2013 Mar; 72(3):483-91. PubMed ID: 23151620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Triple leads programmed to perform as longitudinal guarded cathodes in spinal cord stimulation: a modeling study.
Sankarasubramanian V; Buitenweg JR; Holsheimer J; Veltink P
Neuromodulation; 2011; 14(5):401-10; discussion 411. PubMed ID: 21854494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling effects of scar on patterns of dorsal column stimulation.
Arle JE; Carlson KW; Mei L; Shils JL
Neuromodulation; 2014 Jun; 17(4):320-33; discussion 333. PubMed ID: 24180673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Theoretical investigation into longitudinal cathodal field steering in spinal cord stimulation.
Manola L; Holsheimer J; Veltink PH; Bradley K; Peterson D
Neuromodulation; 2007 Apr; 10(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 22151861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Paresthesia Atlas Illustrates Likelihood of Coverage Based on Spinal Cord Stimulator Electrode Location.
Taghva A; Karst E; Underwood P
Neuromodulation; 2017 Aug; 20(6):582-588. PubMed ID: 28370724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of paresthesia steering with a new system for spinal cord stimulation.
Holsheimer J; Nuttin B; King GW; Wesselink WA; Gybels JM; de Sutter P
Neurosurgery; 1998 Mar; 42(3):541-7; discussion 547-9. PubMed ID: 9526989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational modeling analysis of a spinal cord stimulation paddle lead reveals broad, gapless dermatomal coverage.
Kent AR; Min X; Rosenberg SP; Fayram TA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6254-7. PubMed ID: 25571426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Epidural Stimulation of Rat Spinal Cord at Lumbosacral Segment Using a Surface Electrode: A Computer Simulation Study.
Xu Q; Kong L; Zhou H; He J
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Oct; 25(10):1763-1772. PubMed ID: 27834648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of the spinal cord position in spinal cord stimulation.
Holsheimer J; Barolat G; Struijk JJ; He J
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1995; 64():119-24. PubMed ID: 8748598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biophysics of Frequency-Dependent Variation in Paresthesia and Pain Relief during Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Rogers ER; Capogrosso M; Lempka SF
J Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 44(26):. PubMed ID: 38744531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epidural electrical stimulation of posterior structures of the human lumbosacral cord: 2. quantitative analysis by computer modeling.
Rattay F; Minassian K; Dimitrijevic MR
Spinal Cord; 2000 Aug; 38(8):473-89. PubMed ID: 10962608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mathematical model of nerve fiber activation during low back peripheral nerve field stimulation: analysis of electrode implant depth.
Mørch CD; Nguyen GP; Wacnik PW; Andersen OK
Neuromodulation; 2014 Apr; 17(3):218-25; discussion 225. PubMed ID: 24612321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implanter's Integrated Information (I3) System: An Aid for Spinal Cord Stimulation Procedures.
Meier K; Knudsen ALH; Boudreau SA; Sørensen JCH
Neuromodulation; 2019 Apr; 22(3):290-294. PubMed ID: 30325079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing sensory fiber activation during cervical transcutaneous spinal stimulation using different electrode configurations: A computational analysis.
de Freitas RM; Capogrosso M; Nomura T; Milosevic M
Artif Organs; 2022 Oct; 46(10):2015-2026. PubMed ID: 35642297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerve Fiber Activation During Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation: Importance of Electrode Orientation and Estimation of Area of Paresthesia.
Frahm KS; Hennings K; Vera-Portocarrero L; Wacnik PW; Mørch CD
Neuromodulation; 2016 Apr; 19(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 26586248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
