These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586353)

  • 21. Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face.
    Kaipainen AE; Sieber KR; Nada RM; Maal TJ; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):602-608. PubMed ID: 26666568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Associations among facial masculinity, physical strength, fluctuating asymmetry and attractiveness in young men and women.
    Van Dongen S
    Ann Hum Biol; 2014; 41(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 24555492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative analysis of facial symmetry by using three-dimensional technology.
    Wu Z; Gao X; Long H; Lai W
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):277. PubMed ID: 35799192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful.
    Swaddle JP; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Jul; 261(1360):111-6. PubMed ID: 7644543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A three-dimensional evaluation of human facial asymmetry.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Serrao G
    J Anat; 1995 Feb; 186 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):103-10. PubMed ID: 7649806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.
    Lee JK; Jung PK; Moon CH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23758600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measured symmetry of facial 3D shape and perceived facial symmetry and attractiveness before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Ostwald J; Berssenbrügge P; Dirksen D; Runte C; Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 25841308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cleft Skeletal Asymmetry: Asymmetry Index, Classification and Application.
    Patel DS; Jacobson R; Duan Y; Zhao L; Morris D; Cohen MN
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Mar; 55(3):348-355. PubMed ID: 29437505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of Objective 3-Dimensional Measures of Facial Shape and Symmetry on Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness.
    Hatch CD; Wehby GL; Nidey NL; Moreno Uribe LM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 75(9):1958-1970. PubMed ID: 28577372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry.
    Taylor HO; Morrison CS; Linden O; Phillips B; Chang J; Byrne ME; Sullivan SR; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 24406564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantifying Normal Craniofacial Form and Baseline Craniofacial Asymmetry in the Pediatric Population.
    Cho MJ; Hallac RR; Ramesh J; Seaward JR; Hermann NV; Darvann TA; Lipira A; Kane AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Mar; 141(3):380e-387e. PubMed ID: 29481404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fully Automatic Landmarking of Syndromic 3D Facial Surface Scans Using 2D Images.
    Bannister JJ; Crites SR; Aponte JD; Katz DC; Wilms M; Klein OD; Bernier FPJ; Spritz RA; Hallgrímsson B; Forkert ND
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jun; 20(11):. PubMed ID: 32503190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Preliminary study on the method of automatically determining facial landmarks based on three-dimensional face template].
    Wen AN; Zhu YJ; Zheng SW; Xiao N; Gao ZX; Fu XL; Wang Y; Zhao Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 57(4):358-365. PubMed ID: 35368162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Three-dimensional imaging and cephalometry of cranio-facial asymmetry].
    Treil J; Faure J; Braga J; Casteigt J; Borianne P
    Orthod Fr; 2002 Jun; 73(2):179-97. PubMed ID: 12064067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.
    Huang CS; Liu XQ; Chen YR
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 23324075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with hemifacial microsomia using stereophotogrammetry.
    Cassi D; Battistoni G; Magnifico M; Di Blasio C; Pedrazzi G; Di Blasio A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):179-184. PubMed ID: 30527381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring facial symmetry: a perception-based approach using 3D shape and color.
    Berssenbrügge P; Lingemann-Koch M; Abeler A; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Denz C; Dirksen D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Feb; 60(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25296669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relationship between facial shape asymmetry and attractiveness in Mexican students.
    Farrera A; Villanueva M; Quinto-Sánchez M; González-José R
    Am J Hum Biol; 2015; 27(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 25400276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 3D comparison of average faces in subjects with oral clefts.
    Bugaighis I; Tiddeman B; Mattick CR; Hobson R
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 23172581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.