These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586429)

  • 21. On the possible dangers of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies.
    Bryden MP
    Brain Cogn; 1986 Jul; 5(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 3756008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lateral biases and reading direction: a dissociation between aesthetic preference and line bisection.
    Ishii Y; Okubo M; Nicholls ME; Imai H
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 21215506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Movement compatibility for frontal controls with displays located in four cardinal orientations.
    Chan AH; Hoffmann ER
    Ergonomics; 2010 Dec; 53(12):1403-19. PubMed ID: 21108078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Saccades to remembered targets: the effects of smooth pursuit and illusory stimulus motion.
    Zivotofsky AZ; Rottach KG; Averbuch-Heller L; Kori AA; Thomas CW; Dell'Osso LF; Leigh RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3617-32. PubMed ID: 8985862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [A comparison of Chinese reading parameters among rapid serial visual presentation, full screen and printed displays].
    Wang CX; Lü F; Xu D; Chen J; Xie RZ; Zhu L; Qu J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 43(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 18001567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Horizontal and vertical reading: a comparative investigation of eye movements.
    Schmidt D; Ullrich D; Rossner R
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 2(4-5):251-5. PubMed ID: 8220108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of display factors on Chinese proofreading performance and preferences.
    Chan AH; Ng AW
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(11):1316-30. PubMed ID: 22897680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preferred retinal locus and reading rate with four dynamic text presentation formats.
    Bowers AR; Woods RL; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Mar; 81(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 15017180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords.
    Eviatar Z
    Neuropsychology; 1999 Oct; 13(4):498-515. PubMed ID: 10527058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Positive display polarity is particularly advantageous for small character sizes: implications for display design.
    Piepenbrock C; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Hum Factors; 2014 Aug; 56(5):942-51. PubMed ID: 25141597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Directional preferences of bilingual children.
    Nachshon I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Jun; 56(3):747-50. PubMed ID: 6877962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of a viewing strategy during adaptation to an artificial central scotoma.
    Varsori M; Perez-Fornos A; Safran AB; Whatham AR
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2691-705. PubMed ID: 15358064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reading speed of patients with infantile nystagmus for text in different orientations.
    Gantz L; Sousou M; Gavrilov V; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():17-23. PubMed ID: 30590088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The left ventral occipito-temporal response to words depends on language lateralization but not on visual familiarity.
    Cai Q; Paulignan Y; Brysbaert M; Ibarrola D; Nazir TA
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 May; 20(5):1153-63. PubMed ID: 19684250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of font and line width on reading speed in people with mild to moderate vision loss.
    Rubin GS; Feely M; Perera S; Ekstrom K; Williamson E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Nov; 26(6):545-54. PubMed ID: 17040418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading.
    Jainta S; Blythe HI; Nikolova M; Jones MO; Liversedge SP
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt A):118-27. PubMed ID: 25839421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain.
    Siegenthaler E; Bochud Y; Bergamin P; Wurtz P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 22762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The optimal viewing position effect in printed versus cursive words: Evidence of a reading cost for the cursive font.
    Danna J; Massendari D; Furnari B; Ducrot S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():110-121. PubMed ID: 29908365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cerebral mechanisms for different second language writing systems.
    Koyama MS; Stein JF; Stoodley CJ; Hansen PC
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2261-70. PubMed ID: 23938321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reading text presented on a small display.
    Juola JF; Tiritoglu A; Pleunis J
    Appl Ergon; 1995 Jun; 26(3):227-9. PubMed ID: 15677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.