These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586437)

  • 1. A novel financial risk assessment model for companies based on heterogeneous information and aggregated historical data.
    Li DP; Cheng SJ; Cheng PF; Wang JQ; Zhang HY
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208166. PubMed ID: 30586437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Green Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Artificial Neural Networks.
    Gegovska T; Koker R; Cakar T
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():8811834. PubMed ID: 33082775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Occupational musculoskeletal disorders management using Fuzzy TOPSIS Assessment of Repetitive Tasks (ART).
    Khandan M; Koohpaei AR; Nili M; Farjami Y
    Work; 2017; 56(2):267-276. PubMed ID: 28234261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection.
    Abdel-Basset M; Manogaran G; Gamal A; Smarandache F
    J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):38. PubMed ID: 30627801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance Evaluation of Construction Companies Using Integrated Entropy-Fuzzy VIKOR Model.
    Lam WS; Lam WH; Jaaman SH; Liew KF
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Mar; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 33800468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-criteria decision making based on induced generalized interval neutrosophic Choquet integral.
    Jiao Y; Wang L; Liu J; Ma G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242449. PubMed ID: 33259510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An integrated fuzzy approach for strategic alliance partner selection in third-party logistics.
    Erkayman B; Gundogar E; Yilmaz A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():486306. PubMed ID: 23365520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
    Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
    Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets.
    Ma Q; Sun H; Chen Z; Tan Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294596. PubMed ID: 38011124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains.
    Chen J; Zeng S; Zhang C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 29986549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Credit risk contagion of supply chain finance: An empirical analysis of supply chain listed companies.
    Geng X; Han B; Yang D; Zhao J
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0306724. PubMed ID: 39190762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a Mixed Model to Explore Evaluation Criteria for Bank Supervision: A Banking Supervision Law Perspective.
    Tsai SB; Chen KY; Zhao H; Wei YM; Wang CK; Zheng Y; Chang LC; Wang J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167710. PubMed ID: 27992449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Green Supplier Selection Based on Green Practices Evaluated Using Fuzzy Approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a Case Study in a Chinese Internet Company.
    Qu G; Zhang Z; Qu W; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32392876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sustainability prioritization of sewage sludge to energy scenarios with hybrid-data consideration: a fuzzy decision-making framework based on full consistency method and fusion ranking model.
    Tang C; Xu D; Chen N
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5548-5565. PubMed ID: 32970262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach.
    Varmazyar M; Dehghanbaghi M; Afkhami M
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Oct; 58():125-140. PubMed ID: 27371786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A supplier selection model in pharmaceutical supply chain using PCA, Z-TOPSIS and MILP: A case study.
    Forghani A; Sadjadi SJ; Farhang Moghadam B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201604. PubMed ID: 30110349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.
    Liu F; Zhang WG
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1283-94. PubMed ID: 24081882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach.
    Zhang H; Peng Y; Tian G; Wang D; Xie P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177578. PubMed ID: 28498864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.