309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586444)
1. Self-assembled micro-computed tomography for dental education.
Liao CW; Fuh LJ; Shen YW; Huang HL; Kuo CW; Tsai MT; Hsu JT
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209698. PubMed ID: 30586444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the accuracy of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography reconstructions by using different voxel sizes.
Maret D; Peters OA; Galibourg A; Dumoncel J; Esclassan R; Kahn JL; Sixou M; Telmon N
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25146011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Present and future in the use of micro-CT scanner 3D analysis for the study of dental and root canal morphology.
Grande NM; Plotino G; Gambarini G; Testarelli L; D'Ambrosio F; Pecci R; Bedini R
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2012; 48(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22456012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.
Van Dessel J; Huang Y; Depypere M; Rubira-Bullen I; Maes F; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130145. PubMed ID: 23833320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a useful tool for dental age estimation?
Maret D; Peters OA; Dedouit F; Telmon N; Sixou M
Med Hypotheses; 2011 May; 76(5):700-2. PubMed ID: 21345598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photoacoustic tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography versus micro-computed tomography: Accuracy of 3D reconstructions of human teeth.
Schneider SJM; Höhne C; Schneider M; Schmitter M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0274818. PubMed ID: 36534651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposal of microtomography evaluation for restoration interface gaps.
Meleo D; Manzon L; Pecci R; Zuppante F; Bedini R
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2012; 48(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22456021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construction of three-dimensional tooth model by micro-computed tomography and application for data sharing.
Kato A; Ohno N
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Mar; 13(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 18386082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of new and current methods for dental micro-CT image denoising.
Shahmoradi M; Lashgari M; Rabbani H; Qin J; Swain M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150302. PubMed ID: 26764583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography.
He RT; Tu MG; Huang HL; Tsai MT; Wu J; Hsu JT
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 30674282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic reconstruction method for high-contrast panoramic image from dental cone-beam CT data.
Yun Z; Yang S; Huang E; Zhao L; Yang W; Feng Q
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 175():205-214. PubMed ID: 31104708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Digital Periapical Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Natural and Simulated External Root Resorption.
Deliga Schröder ÂG; Westphalen FH; Schröder JC; Fernandes Â; Westphalen VPD
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 29884337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars. Part III. Anatomic features revealed by digital subtraction radiography.
Fan W; Fan B; Gutmann JL; Fan M
J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1187-90. PubMed ID: 18793917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Micro-Computed Tomography and Digital Intraoral Radiography to Determine the Accuracy of Digital Radiographic Measurements of Mandibular Molar Teeth in Dogs.
Marron L; Rawlinson J; McGilvray K; Prytherch B
J Vet Dent; 2017 Dec; 34(4):248-258. PubMed ID: 28974160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a comparative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography.
Zhang D; Chen J; Lan G; Li M; An J; Wen X; Liu L; Deng M
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1007-1012. PubMed ID: 27178313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micro-Computed Tomography Assessment of Apical Accessory Canal Morphologies.
Xu T; Tay FR; Gutmann JL; Fan B; Fan W; Huang Z; Sun Q
J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):798-802. PubMed ID: 26975416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations.
Holberg C; Steinhäuser S; Geis P; Rudzki-Janson I
J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Nov; 66(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 16331544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
