511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586681)
1. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Balance Super Learner: A robust adaptation of the Super Learner to improve estimation of the average treatment effect in the treated based on propensity score matching.
Pirracchio R; Carone M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2504-2518. PubMed ID: 28339317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Super Learner Prediction Modeling to Improve High-dimensional Propensity Score Estimation.
Wyss R; Schneeweiss S; van der Laan M; Lendle SD; Ju C; Franklin JM
Epidemiology; 2018 Jan; 29(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 28991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving propensity score estimators' robustness to model misspecification using super learner.
Pirracchio R; Petersen ML; van der Laan M
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 181(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25515168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parametric and nonparametric propensity score estimation in multilevel observational studies.
Salditt M; Nestler S
Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(23):4147-4176. PubMed ID: 37532119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vector-based kernel weighting: A simple estimator for improving precision and bias of average treatment effects in multiple treatment settings.
Garrido MM; Lum J; Pizer SD
Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1204-1223. PubMed ID: 33327037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On regression adjustment for the propensity score.
Vansteelandt S; Daniel RM
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4053-72. PubMed ID: 24825821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.
Ertefaie A; Stephens DA
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 14. PubMed ID: 21969998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.
Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M
Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
Austin PC; Stuart EA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
Schuler MS; Rose S
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flexible propensity score estimation strategies for clustered data in observational studies.
Chang TH; Nguyen TQ; Lee Y; Jackson JW; Stuart EA
Stat Med; 2022 Nov; 41(25):5016-5032. PubMed ID: 36263918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Stuart EA; Lee BK; Leacy FP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1. PubMed ID: 23849158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propensity Score-Based Estimators With Multiple Error-Prone Covariates.
Hong H; Aaby DA; Siddique J; Stuart EA
Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):222-230. PubMed ID: 30358801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
