These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30586956)

  • 21. Ensuring global standards for medical graduates: a pilot study of international standard-setting.
    Stern DT; Ben-David MF; De Champlain A; Hodges B; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
    Med Teach; 2005 May; 27(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 16011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. OSCE for the Medical Licensing Examination in Korea.
    Lee YS
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Dec; 24(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 19251560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Convergence between cluster analysis and the Angoff method for setting minimum passing scores on credentialing examinations.
    Hess B; Subhiyah RG; Giordano C
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 17986670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Presidential address: Adoption of a clinical skills examination for dental licensing, implementation of computer-based testing for the medical licensing examination, and the 30th anniversary of the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute.
    Lee YS
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():1. PubMed ID: 35007415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do baseline data influence standard setting for a clinical skills examination?
    Wayne DB; Barsuk JH; Cohen E; McGaghie WC
    Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S105-8. PubMed ID: 17895672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Presidential address: Demonstration of the international leadership of the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute, introduction of a clinical skills test to the Korean Dental Licensing Examination, and strengthening of ethics items on licensing examinations.
    Lee YS
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2019; 16():15. PubMed ID: 31177646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two methods of standard setting: the performance of the three-level Angoff method.
    Jalili M; Hejri SM; Norcini JJ
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simpler standards for local performance examinations: the Yes/No Angoff and whole-test Ebel.
    Yudkowsky R; Downing SM; Wirth S
    Teach Learn Med; 2008; 20(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 18615294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Standard-Setting for Continuing Education Assessment of Select New Competencies.
    Thomas D; Abdalla A; McKeirnan K; Khalifa S
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2022 Jan; 42(1):e96-e98. PubMed ID: 34609352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standard setting: comparison of two methods.
    George S; Haque MS; Oyebode F
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Sep; 6():46. PubMed ID: 16972990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Setting standards in knowledge assessments: Comparing Ebel and Cohen via Rasch.
    Homer M; Darling JC
    Med Teach; 2016 Dec; 38(12):1267-1277. PubMed ID: 27650218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students.
    Verhoeven BH; Verwijnen GM; Muijtjens AM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2002 Sep; 36(9):860-7. PubMed ID: 12354249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Education, learning and assessment: current trends and best practice for medical educators.
    Tormey W
    Ir J Med Sci; 2015 Mar; 184(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24549647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cut-scores revisited: feasibility of a new method for group standard setting.
    Shulruf B; Coombes L; Damodaran A; Freeman A; Jones P; Lieberman S; Poole P; Rhee J; Wilkinson T; Harris P
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 18(1):126. PubMed ID: 29879954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship of individual examinee characteristics and acceptability of smart device-based testing to test score in the practice test of the Korea Emergency Medicine Technician Licensing Examination.
    Lim EY; Yim MK; Huh S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():33. PubMed ID: 30586957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Presidential address: launching the Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute, a government-supported special foundation from December 23, 2015.
    Kim CH
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():20. PubMed ID: 27246493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Varying levels of difficulty index of skills-test items randomly selected by examinees on the Korean emergency medical technician licensing examination.
    Koh B; Hong S; Kim SS; Hyun JS; Baek M; Moon J; Kwon H; Kim G; Min S; Kang GH
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():5. PubMed ID: 26883810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of examination objectives based on nursing competency for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination: a validity study.
    Shin S; Kim GS; Song JA; Lee I
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():19. PubMed ID: 35989557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Usefulness of the DETECT program for assessing the internal structure of dimensionality in simulated data and results of the Korean nursing licensing examination.
    Seo DG; Choi Y; Huh S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():32. PubMed ID: 29278904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Converging on the tipping point: a diagnostic methodology for standard setting.
    Stahl JA; Becker KA
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(4):399-426. PubMed ID: 22357160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.