These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. How reliable is the clinical exam in detecting ocular chlamydial infection? Miller K; Schmidt G; Melese M; Alemayehu W; Yi E; Cevallos V; Donnellan C; Olinger L; Fantaye D; Gaynor B; Whitcher JP; Lietman T Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 15370556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Strategies for control of trachoma: observational study with quantitative PCR. Solomon AW; Holland MJ; Burton MJ; West SK; Alexander ND; Aguirre A; Massae PA; Mkocha H; Muñoz B; Johnson GJ; Peeling RW; Bailey RL; Foster A; Mabey DC Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9379):198-204. PubMed ID: 12885481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Persisting inapparent chlamydial infection in a trachoma endemic community in The Gambia. Ward M; Bailey R; Lesley A; Kajbaf M; Robertson J; Mabey D Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1990; 69():137-48. PubMed ID: 2263890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Molecular approach by PCR is the best method to detect the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis and to define the true agent of ocular bacterial inflammation. Gallenga PE; Del Boccio M; Rapinese M; Di Iorio A; Toniato E; Martinotti S Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2011; 24(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 21658303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Studies on trachoma. II. Comparison of fluorescent antibody, giemsa, and egg isolation methods for detection of trachoma virus in human conjunctival scrapings. NICHOLS RL; McCO MB DE; HADDAD N; MURRAY ES Am J Trop Med Hyg; 1963 Mar; 12():223-9. PubMed ID: 13938349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Laboratory techniques for diagnosis of chlamydial infections of the eye. Baveja UK; Hiranandani MK; Talwar P; Sen DK J Commun Dis; 1997 Sep; 29(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 9465530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rapid assessment of trachoma among children living in rural northern India. Khanduja S; Jhanji V; Sharma N; Vashist P; Murthy GV; Gupta S; Satpathy G; Tandon R; Titiyal JS; Vajpayee RB Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2009; 16(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 19874140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from different areas of conjunctiva in relation to intensity of hyperendemic trachoma in school children in Southern Tunisia. Darougar S; Jones BR; Daghfous T; Hejazi R Br J Ophthalmol; 1979 Feb; 63(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 427070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparative studies in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections]. Deák J; Nedelkovics Z; Földes J Orv Hetil; 1994 Feb; 135(9):465-8. PubMed ID: 8139850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The epidemiology of infection in trachoma. Taylor HR; Rapoza PA; West S; Johnson S; Munoz B; Katala S; Mmbaga BB Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Aug; 30(8):1823-33. PubMed ID: 2668220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Inappropriate use of nonculture tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in suspected victims of child sexual abuse: A continuing problem. Hammerschlag MR; Ajl S; Laraque D Pediatrics; 1999 Nov; 104(5 Pt 1):1137-9. PubMed ID: 10545561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Validity of the Gram and Lendrum stains in conjunctival smears for the identification of Chlamydia trachomatis]. de Ramírez I; Mejía M; García de la Riva JC; Hermes F; Grazioso CF Bol Oficina Sanit Panam; 1994 Mar; 116(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 7518685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]