424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30589219)
1. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Viechtbauer W
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16463355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A generalized-weights solution to sample overlap in meta-analysis.
Bom PRD; Rachinger H
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):812-832. PubMed ID: 32790019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Random effects meta-analysis: Coverage performance of 95% confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation.
Partlett C; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):301-317. PubMed ID: 27714841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails?
Jackson D; Bowden J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27604952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence intervals for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis of rare binary event data.
Wang G; Cheng Y; Chen M; Wang X
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106440. PubMed ID: 34015509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uncertainty of the time of first significance in random effects cumulative meta-analysis.
Berkey CS; Mosteller F; Lau J; Antman EM
Control Clin Trials; 1996 Oct; 17(5):357-71. PubMed ID: 8932970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Capturing the underlying distribution in meta-analysis: Credibility and tolerance intervals.
Brannick MT; French KA; Rothstein HR; Kiselica AM; Apostoloski N
Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):264-290. PubMed ID: 33543583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections.
Noma H
Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Heterogeneity estimation in meta-analysis of standardized mean differences when the distribution of random effects departs from normal: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Blázquez-Rincón D; Sánchez-Meca J; Botella J; Suero M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36650428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
Henmi M; Copas JB
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confidence intervals and sample size calculations for the weighted eta-squared effect sizes in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
Shieh G
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 22806705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics.
Jackson D
Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 26053842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of heterogeneity variance based on a generalized Q statistic in meta-analysis of log-odds-ratio.
Kulinskaya E; Hoaglin DC
Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):671-688. PubMed ID: 37381621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
Lin L
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
