These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30589358)

  • 1. Overt spatial attention modulates multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 30589358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisensory distractor processing is modulated by spatial attention.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 31343245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expected but omitted stimuli affect crossmodal interaction.
    Costantini M; Migliorati D; Donno B; Sirota M; Ferri F
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():52-64. PubMed ID: 29107888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatiotemporal competition and task-relevance shape the spatial distribution of emotional interference during rapid visual processing: Evidence from gaze-contingent eye-tracking.
    Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Sutton DJ; Beesley T; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 29147961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodal visual-somatosensory integration in saccade generation.
    Amlôt R; Walker R; Driver J; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 12427561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staying within the lines: the formation of visuospatial boundaries influences multisensory feature integration.
    Fiebelkorn IC; Foxe JJ; Schwartz TH; Molholm S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1737-43. PubMed ID: 20584177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories.
    Doyle MC; Walker R
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 11797089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tones disrupt visual fixations and responding on a visual-spatial task.
    Laughery D; Pesina N; Robinson CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 32730069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference of irrelevant information in multisensory selection depends on attentional set.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1176-1195. PubMed ID: 31444699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception it is: Processing level in multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1391-1406. PubMed ID: 31429042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Holmes NP; Spence C; Hansen PC; Mackay CE; Calvert GA
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3502. PubMed ID: 18958150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of irrelevant response codes is affected by matching target-distractor modalities.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):189-208. PubMed ID: 30589356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motor congruency and multisensory integration jointly facilitate visual information processing before movement execution.
    Elshout JA; Van der Stoep N; Nijboer TCW; Van der Stigchel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Mar; 238(3):667-673. PubMed ID: 32036413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Higher-Order Cognition Does Not Affect Multisensory Distractor Processing.
    Merz S; Jensen A; Burau C; Spence C; Frings C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Sep; 34(4):351-364. PubMed ID: 33706263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Altered auditory-tactile interactions in congenitally blind humans: an event-related potential study.
    Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 15241575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.