These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30589443)

  • 1. Inclusion of memory effects in a dynamic model of electroporation in biological tissues.
    Weinert R; Pereira E; Ramos A
    Artif Organs; 2019 Jul; 43(7):688-693. PubMed ID: 30589443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic finite-element model for efficient modelling of electric currents in electroporated tissue.
    Langus J; Kranjc M; Kos B; Šuštar T; Miklavčič D
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26409. PubMed ID: 27211822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation.
    Corovic S; Lackovic I; Sustaric P; Sustar T; Rodic T; Miklavcic D
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Feb; 12():16. PubMed ID: 23433433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oral Mucosa Model for Electrochemotherapy Treatment of Dog Mouth Cancer: Ex Vivo, In Silico, and In Vivo Experiments.
    Suzuki DOH; Berkenbrock JA; Frederico MJS; Silva FRMB; Rangel MMM
    Artif Organs; 2018 Mar; 42(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 29027689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Educational application for visualization and analysis of electric field strength in multiple electrode electroporation.
    Mahnič-Kalamiza S; Kotnik T; Miklavčič D
    BMC Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 12():102. PubMed ID: 23107609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental characterization and numerical modeling of tissue electrical conductivity during pulsed electric fields for irreversible electroporation treatment planning.
    Neal RE; Garcia PA; Robertson JL; Davalos RV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1076-85. PubMed ID: 22231669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential finite element model of tissue electropermeabilization.
    Sel D; Cukjati D; Batiuskaite D; Slivnik T; Mir LM; Miklavcic D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 15887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomically Realistic Simulations of Liver Ablation by Irreversible Electroporation: Impact of Blood Vessels on Ablation Volumes and Undertreatment.
    Qasrawi R; Silve L; Burdío F; Abdeen Z; Ivorra A
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):783-792. PubMed ID: 28093955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of the electroporation in the field calculation in biological tissues.
    Ramos A
    Artif Organs; 2005 Jun; 29(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 15926990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental characterization of intrapulse tissue conductivity changes for electroporation.
    Neal RE; Garcia PA; Robertson JL; Davalos RV
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5581-4. PubMed ID: 22255604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic Electroporation Model Evaluation on Rabbit Tissues.
    Weinert RL; Knabben MA; Pereira EM; Garcia CE; Ramos A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Sep; 49(9):2503-2512. PubMed ID: 34169397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo electrical impedance measurements during and after electroporation of rat liver.
    Ivorra A; Rubinsky B
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2007 May; 70(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 17140860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric field modulation in tissue electroporation with electrolytic and non-electrolytic additives.
    Ivorra A; Rubinsky B
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2007 May; 70(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 17350351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impedance analyzer for in vivo electroporation studies.
    Ivorra A; Rubinsky B
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5056-9. PubMed ID: 17946279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo muscle electroporation threshold determination: realistic numerical models and in vivo experiments.
    Čorović S; Mir LM; Miklavčič D
    J Membr Biol; 2012 Sep; 245(9):509-20. PubMed ID: 22622286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical conductivity changes during irreversible electroporation treatment of brain cancer.
    Garcia PA; Rossmeisl JH; Davalos RV
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():739-42. PubMed ID: 22254416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods of optimization of electrical impedance tomography for imaging tissue electroporation.
    Granot Y; Rubinsky B
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1135-47. PubMed ID: 17906383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Nonlinear Size-Dependent Equivalent Circuit Model for Single-Cell Electroporation on Microfluidic Chips.
    Shagoshtasbi H; Deng P; Lee YK
    J Lab Autom; 2015 Aug; 20(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 25735616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Multiscale Computational Model of Skeletal Muscle Electroporation Validated Using In Situ Porcine Experiments.
    Smerc R; Ramirez DA; Mahnic-Kalamiza S; Dermol-Cerne J; Sigg DC; Mattison LM; Iaizzo PA; Miklavcic D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Jun; 70(6):1826-1837. PubMed ID: 37022450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-Dependent Finite Element Analysis of In Vivo Electrochemotherapy Treatment.
    Pintar M; Langus J; Edhemović I; Brecelj E; Kranjc M; Sersa G; Šuštar T; Rodič T; Miklavčič D; Kotnik T; Kos B
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818790510. PubMed ID: 30089424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.