These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30589443)

  • 21. Electrode activation sequencing employing conductivity changes in irreversible electroporation tissue ablation.
    Sahakian AV; Al-Angari HM; Adeyanju OO
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Mar; 59(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 22194234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for measuring electrical conductivity during electroporation.
    Kranjc M; Bajd F; Serša I; Miklavčič D
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Jun; 35(6):985-96. PubMed ID: 24844299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of cytoplasm conductivity by nanosecond pulsed electric fields.
    Denzi A; Merla C; Palego C; Paffi A; Ning Y; Multari CR; Cheng X; Apollonio F; Hwang JC; Liberti M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jun; 62(6):1595-603. PubMed ID: 25667343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Numerical simulation of electroporation in spherical cells.
    Ramos A; Suzuki DO; Marques JL
    Artif Organs; 2004 Apr; 28(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 15084196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multishot echo-planar MREIT for fast imaging of conductivity, current density, and electric field distributions.
    Chauhan M; Vidya Shankar R; Ashok Kumar N; Kodibagkar VD; Sadleir R
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 28205251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electric field of a six-needle array electrode used in drug and DNA delivery in vivo: analytical versus numerical solution.
    Dev SB; Dhar D; Krassowska W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1296-300. PubMed ID: 14620000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vivo irreversible electroporation kidney ablation: experimentally correlated numerical models.
    Neal RE; Garcia PA; Kavnoudias H; Rosenfeldt F; Mclean CA; Earl V; Bergman J; Davalos RV; Thomson KR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 62(2):561-9. PubMed ID: 25265626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Moveable wire electrode microchamber for nanosecond pulsed electric-field delivery.
    Wu YH; Arnaud-Cormos D; Casciola M; Sanders JM; Leveque P; Vernier PT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Feb; 60(2):489-96. PubMed ID: 23192479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of a Multi-Pulse Conductivity Model for Liver Tissue Treated With Pulsed Electric Fields.
    Zhao Y; Zheng S; Beitel-White N; Liu H; Yao C; Davalos RV
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():396. PubMed ID: 32509742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modeling environment for numerical simulation of applied electric fields on biological cells.
    Suzuki DO; Ramos A; Marques JL
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2007; 26(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 17886010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Avoiding the side effects of electric current pulse application to electroporated cells in disposable small volume cuvettes assures good cell survival.
    Grys M; Madeja Z; Korohoda W
    Cell Mol Biol Lett; 2017; 22():1. PubMed ID: 28536632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite-element modeling of needle electrodes in tissue from the perspective of frequent model computation.
    Sel D; Mazeres S; Teissie J; Miklavcic D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1221-32. PubMed ID: 14619992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An "Off-the-Shelf" System for Intraprocedural Electrical Current Evaluation and Monitoring of Irreversible Electroporation Therapy.
    Neal RE; Kavnoudias H; Thomson KR
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2015 Jun; 38(3):736-41. PubMed ID: 25159215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Irreversible electroporation ablation: creation of large-volume ablation zones in in vivo porcine liver with four-electrode arrays.
    Appelbaum L; Ben-David E; Faroja M; Nissenbaum Y; Sosna J; Goldberg SN
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):416-24. PubMed ID: 24126371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physiological changes may dominate the electrical properties of liver during reversible electroporation: Measurements and modelling.
    García-Sánchez T; Voyer D; Poignard C; Mir LM
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Dec; 136():107627. PubMed ID: 32784102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. EView: An electric field visualization web platform for electroporation-based therapies.
    Perera-Bel E; Yagüe C; Mercadal B; Ceresa M; Beitel-White N; Davalos RV; Ballester MAG; Ivorra A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105682. PubMed ID: 32795723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of blood vessel segmentation on the outcome of electroporation-based treatments of liver tumors.
    Marčan M; Kos B; Miklavčič D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125591. PubMed ID: 25941806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In silico estimates of cell electroporation by electrical incapacitation waveforms.
    Gowrishankar TR; Esser AT; Smith KC; Burns SK; Weaver JC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6505-8. PubMed ID: 19964168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anistropically varying conductivity in irreversible electroporation simulations.
    Labarbera N; Drapaca C
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2017 Nov; 14(1):20. PubMed ID: 29089031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for monitoring electric field distribution during tissue electroporation.
    Kranjc M; Bajd F; Serša I; Miklavčič D
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1771-8. PubMed ID: 21521664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.