These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30589502)

  • 1. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Janner SFM; Schimmel M; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30589502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study.
    Sittikornpaiboon P; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of implant macrodesign and insertion connection technology on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery.
    El Kholy K; Ebenezer S; Wittneben JG; Lazarin R; Rousson D; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 31429184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Study on the influence of sleeve height and implant length on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery].
    Wang QF; He ZD; Yu HY; Qiu XH; Wang YY; Han J; Yang J; Sun XD; Li XB; Li ZY; Fan H; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):902-907. PubMed ID: 33171566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery.
    Koop R; Vercruyssen M; Vermeulen K; Quirynen M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):630-4. PubMed ID: 22413853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation.
    Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of drilling sequence and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in extraction sockets and healed sites-An in vitro investigation.
    Raabe C; Dulla FA; Yilmaz B; Chappuis V; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Apr; 34(4):320-329. PubMed ID: 36727584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in-vitro analysis of the accuracy of different guided surgery systems - They are not all the same.
    Guentsch A; Bjork J; Saxe R; Han S; Dentino AR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 May; 34(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 36892499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Precision and trueness of computer-assisted implant placement using static surgical guides with open and closed sleeves: An in vitro analysis.
    Guentsch A; An H; Dentino AR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Apr; 33(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 35148444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of keyless vs drill-key implant systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery using two guide-hole designs compared to freehand implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Raabe C; Schuetz TS; Chappuis V; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S; Couso-Queiruga E
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Feb; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 36749441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does guided level (fully or partially) influence implant placement accuracy at post-extraction sockets and healed sites? An in vitro study.
    Chen Z; Li J; Ceolin Meneghetti P; Galli M; Mendonça G; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5449-5458. PubMed ID: 35499656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Guided and computer-assisted implant surgery and prosthetic: The continuous digital workflow].
    Pascual D; Vaysse J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2016 Feb; 117(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 26781159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Anchor-Guiding Sleeve Length on the Accuracy of Computer-Guided Flapless Implant Surgery.
    Dusmukhamedov S; Lee C; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Dec; 48(6):578-583. PubMed ID: 35881817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation.
    Kalt G; Gehrke P
    Int J Comput Dent; 2008; 11(3-4):213-25. PubMed ID: 19216313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study.
    Struwe M; Leontiev W; Connert T; Kühl S; Filippi A; Herber V; Dagassan-Berndt D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Mar; 34(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 36626272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional free-hand, dynamic navigation and static guided implant surgery produce similar short-term patient-reported outcome measures and experiences.
    Afrashtehfar KI
    Evid Based Dent; 2021 Dec; 22(4):143-145. PubMed ID: 34916642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.