These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30589851)

  • 1. Population structure in genetic studies: Confounding factors and mixed models.
    Sul JH; Martin LS; Eskin E
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1007309. PubMed ID: 30589851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for Population Structure in Gene-by-Environment Interactions in Genome-Wide Association Studies Using Mixed Models.
    Sul JH; Bilow M; Yang WY; Kostem E; Furlotte N; He D; Eskin E
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1005849. PubMed ID: 26943367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous SNP selection and adjustment for population structure in high dimensional prediction models.
    Bhatnagar SR; Yang Y; Lu T; Schurr E; Loredo-Osti JC; Forest M; Oualkacha K; Greenwood CMT
    PLoS Genet; 2020 May; 16(5):e1008766. PubMed ID: 32365090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjusting for Familial Relatedness in the Analysis of GWAS Data.
    Thomson R; McWhirter R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1526():175-190. PubMed ID: 27896742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control for Population Structure and Relatedness for Binary Traits in Genetic Association Studies via Logistic Mixed Models.
    Chen H; Wang C; Conomos MP; Stilp AM; Li Z; Sofer T; Szpiro AA; Chen W; Brehm JM; Celedón JC; Redline S; Papanicolaou GJ; Thornton TA; Laurie CC; Rice K; Lin X
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Apr; 98(4):653-66. PubMed ID: 27018471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local ancestry corrects for population structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome-wide association studies.
    Diao L; Chen KC
    Genetics; 2012 Dec; 192(4):1503-11. PubMed ID: 23023004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overview of Statistical Methods for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
    Hayes B
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():149-69. PubMed ID: 23756890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single Marker Family-Based Association Analysis Not Conditional on Parental Information.
    Namkung J; Won S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():409-439. PubMed ID: 28980257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-Wide Association with Uncertainty in the Genetic Similarity Matrix.
    Wang S; Ge S; Sobkowiak B; Wang L; Grandjean L; Colijn C; Elliott LT
    J Comput Biol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 36374242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A resource-efficient tool for mixed model association analysis of large-scale data.
    Jiang L; Zheng Z; Qi T; Kemper KE; Wray NR; Visscher PM; Yang J
    Nat Genet; 2019 Dec; 51(12):1749-1755. PubMed ID: 31768069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Software engineering the mixed model for genome-wide association studies on large samples.
    Zhang Z; Buckler ES; Casstevens TM; Bradbury PJ
    Brief Bioinform; 2009 Nov; 10(6):664-75. PubMed ID: 19933212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of mixed model based approaches for correcting for population substructure with application to extreme phenotype sampling.
    Onifade M; Roy-Gagnon MH; Parent MÉ; Burkett KM
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 35120458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principal component regression and linear mixed model in association analysis of structured samples: competitors or complements?
    Zhang Y; Pan W
    Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 39(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25536929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guidance for the utility of linear models in meta-analysis of genetic association studies of binary phenotypes.
    Cook JP; Mahajan A; Morris AP
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Feb; 25(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27848946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide mapping of quantitative trait loci in admixed populations using mixed linear model and Bayesian multiple regression analysis.
    Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JCM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):32. PubMed ID: 29914353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the power of GWAS and avoiding confounding from population stratification with PC-Select.
    Tucker G; Price AL; Berger B
    Genetics; 2014 Jul; 197(3):1045-9. PubMed ID: 24788602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of population stratification adjustment using genome-wide or exonic variants.
    Chen Y; Peloso GM; Liu CT; DeStefano AL; Dupuis J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 44(7):702-716. PubMed ID: 32608112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further improvements to linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies.
    Widmer C; Lippert C; Weissbrod O; Fusi N; Kadie C; Davidson R; Listgarten J; Heckerman D
    Sci Rep; 2014 Nov; 4():6874. PubMed ID: 25387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trade-offs of Linear Mixed Models in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
    Wang H; Aragam B; Xing EP
    J Comput Biol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 35230156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.