These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest. Wang PL; Brooks SC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD007260. PubMed ID: 30125048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis. Westfall M; Krantz S; Mullin C; Kaufman C Crit Care Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1782-9. PubMed ID: 23660728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pilot Study to Compare the Use of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide-Guided and Diastolic Blood Pressure-Guided Chest Compression Delivery in a Swine Model of Neonatal Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest. O'Brien CE; Reyes M; Santos PT; Heitmiller SE; Kulikowicz E; Kudchadkar SR; Lee JK; Hunt EA; Koehler RC; Shaffner DH J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Oct; 7(19):e009728. PubMed ID: 30371318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Video-recording and time-motion analyses of manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation during ambulance transport. Wang HC; Chiang WC; Chen SY; Ke YL; Chi CL; Yang CW; Lin PC; Ko PC; Wang YC; Tsai TC; Huang CH; Hsiung KH; Ma MH; Chen SC; Chen WJ; Lin FY Resuscitation; 2007 Sep; 74(3):453-60. PubMed ID: 17386966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of Automated Simultaneous Sternothoracic Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Device on Hemodynamics in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients. Lee DK; Cha YS; Kim OH; Cha KC; Lee KH; Hwang SO; Kim H; Lee YH; Chae MK J Emerg Med; 2018 Aug; 55(2):226-234. PubMed ID: 29885734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simulation study on quality of CPR between manual chest compression and mechanical chest compression devices performed in ambulance. Kamauzaman THT; Ngu JTH; Arithra A; Noh AYM; Siti-Azrin AH; Nor J Med J Malaysia; 2021 Mar; 76(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 33742624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio versus continuous chest compression with asynchronous ventilation in a porcine model of neonatal resuscitation. Schmölzer GM; O'Reilly M; Labossiere J; Lee TF; Cowan S; Nicoll J; Bigam DL; Cheung PY Resuscitation; 2014 Feb; 85(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 24161768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A remote-controlled automatic chest compression device capable of moving compression position during CPR: A pilot study in a mannequin and a swine model of cardiac arrest. Suh GJ; Kim T; Kim KS; Kwon WY; Kim H; Park H; Wang G; Park J; Hur S; Sim J; Kim K; Lee JC; Shin DA; Cho WS; Kim BJ; Kwon S; Lee YJ PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0297057. PubMed ID: 38241416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Full recovery after prolonged cardiac arrest and resuscitation with mechanical chest compression device during helicopter transportation and percutaneous coronary intervention. Forti A; Zilio G; Zanatta P; Ferramosca M; Gatto C; Gheno A; Rosi P J Emerg Med; 2014 Dec; 47(6):632-4. PubMed ID: 25300208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. Rubertsson S; Lindgren E; Smekal D; Östlund O; Silfverstolpe J; Lichtveld RA; Boomars R; Ahlstedt B; Skoog G; Kastberg R; Halliwell D; Box M; Herlitz J; Karlsten R JAMA; 2014 Jan; 311(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 24240611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority. Koster RW; Beenen LF; van der Boom EB; Spijkerboer AM; Tepaske R; van der Wal AC; Beesems SG; Tijssen JG Eur Heart J; 2017 Oct; 38(40):3006-3013. PubMed ID: 29088439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Gates S; Quinn T; Deakin CD; Blair L; Couper K; Perkins GD Resuscitation; 2015 Sep; 94():91-7. PubMed ID: 26190673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Per-Protocol and Pre-Defined population analysis of the LINC study. Rubertsson S; Lindgren E; Smekal D; Östlund O; Silfverstolpe J; Lichtveld RA; Boomars R; Bruins W; Ahlstedt B; Skoog G; Kastberg R; Halliwell D; Box M; Herlitz J; Karlsten R Resuscitation; 2015 Nov; 96():92-9. PubMed ID: 26247144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of continuous compressions and 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation on global ventilation/perfusion values during resuscitation in a porcine model. Wang S; Li C; Ji X; Yang L; Su Z; Wu J Crit Care Med; 2010 Oct; 38(10):2024-30. PubMed ID: 20683258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mechanical chest compressions improved aspects of CPR in the LINC trial. Esibov A; Banville I; Chapman FW; Boomars R; Box M; Rubertsson S Resuscitation; 2015 Jun; 91():116-21. PubMed ID: 25766094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study. Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions (bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation) improves outcome in a swine model of prehospital pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest. Berg RA; Hilwig RW; Kern KB; Babar I; Ewy GA Crit Care Med; 1999 Sep; 27(9):1893-9. PubMed ID: 10507615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Standardized model of porcine resuscitation using a custom-made resuscitation board results in optimal hemodynamic management. Wollborn J; Ruetten E; Schlueter B; Haberstroh J; Goebel U; Schick MA Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Oct; 36(10):1738-1744. PubMed ID: 29395757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]