These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

39 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059110)

  • 1. [Screening with mammography--a critical attitude is supported by new findings].
    Andersson I; Janzon L
    Lakartidningen; 1988 Nov; 85(44):3666-9. PubMed ID: 3059110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden.
    Tabár L; Gad A; Holmberg L; Ljungquist U
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):158-64. PubMed ID: 3896614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [We should insist on mammographic mass screening. Its value for age groups 50-69 is indisputable].
    Larsson LG; Nyström L
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Apr; 93(14):1338-42. PubMed ID: 8656867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass screening for breast cancer.
    Strax P
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Jun; 68(6):457-66. PubMed ID: 17474655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reexamine screening of women under age 50.
    Hendee WR
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Sep; 15(9):27-30, 101. PubMed ID: 10146348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Promising results from mammography screening].
    Thurfjell E
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Mar; 92(12):1197-8. PubMed ID: 7707753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Create an individual-based national registry of mammographic screening].
    Nyström L
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1450-1. PubMed ID: 10765628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Debate among researchers over mammography screening and the potential effect of that debate on screening in the United States.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jan; 100(2):156. PubMed ID: 18182608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening for breast cancer and cost-effectiveness of thermal diagnostic techniques.
    Berger GS; Keith LG
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 107():839-49. PubMed ID: 6820147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
    Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
    Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence of mammary carcinoma in patients with gynaecologic cancer.
    Johnsson JE; Möller T; Ranstam J; Jarlman O; Samuelsson L; Trope C
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1987; 76(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 3497605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast cancer screening in Sweden. The single modality approach.
    Andersson I; Fagerberg G; Lundgren B; Tabár L
    Radiologe; 1980 Dec; 20(12):608-11. PubMed ID: 7208897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of individual breast cancer screening in the Alpes-Maritimes].
    Fontas P; Bregeault A; Maestro C; Namer M; Obadia Y; Rotily M
    J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 77(9):657-62. PubMed ID: 8944122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography and the value of screening.
    Whitehouse GH
    Br J Hosp Med; 1985 Nov; 34(5):263. PubMed ID: 3836718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Make an independent assessment of mammographic screening!].
    Einhorn J
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1366-7. PubMed ID: 10765617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening.
    Shapiro S; Venet W; Strax P; Venet L; Roeser R
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1985 May; 67():65-74. PubMed ID: 4047153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [600,000 women are examined by mammography per year. Every fifth of them refuses screening].
    Olsson S; Andersson I; Bjurstam N; Frodis E; Håkansson S; Lithander E; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Feb; 92(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 7853942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mass screening for breast cancer: is it worthwhile?
    Vogel VG
    Tex Med; 1988 May; 84(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 3406897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mammography screening of women aged 50-69: now only two controversies!].
    Dige U
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jun; 93(26-27):2492-3. PubMed ID: 8684074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.