These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059126)

  • 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and biochemical identification using multipoint inoculation: 5 years' experience.
    Pease AA; Wheat PF; Harris DM
    Med Lab Sci; 1988 Jan; 45(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 3059126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multipoint identification. Experience with an established technique.
    Solaro L
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1985; 78(7-12):127-33. PubMed ID: 3916329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Automated technics in microbiological diagnosis compared with conventional methods].
    Schmitt Y
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1986 Apr; 261(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 3526759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A semi-automated method for the culture, identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria direct from urine specimens.
    Henrichsen C; Moyes A
    Med Lab Sci; 1987 Jan; 44(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 3309532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid identification and susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 system using culture fluids from positive BacT/ALERT blood cultures.
    Chen JR; Lee SY; Yang BH; Lu JJ
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2008 Jun; 41(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 18629422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quantitative sensitivity determination of bacteria. Indications and methods].
    von Graevenitz A; Heitz M; Lüthy R; Meyer J; Tosch W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Apr; 117(14):509-17. PubMed ID: 3554500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reliability of the bacterial identification tests and of antibiotic sensitivity tests made with automatic methods].
    Goffi M; Somenzi P; Magliani W; Menozzi MG
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1981 Mar; 17(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 7313071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a Rapid System for Antimicrobial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Pediatric Bloodstream Infections.
    Ward E; Weller K; Gomez J; Roman K; Cárdenas AM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 56(9):. PubMed ID: 29925640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controversies in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
    Witebsky FG
    Clin Lab Med; 1984 Mar; 4(1):99-121. PubMed ID: 6610526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of wider system for direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from positive blood culture bottles.
    Fontanals D; Salceda F; Hernández J; Sanfeliu I; Torra M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 21(9):693-5. PubMed ID: 12373507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dipslide urine cultures in combination with antimicrobial sensitivity testing. A controlled investigation in general practice.
    Rapoport B; Rudensky B
    Practitioner; 1980 Sep; 224(1347):931-4. PubMed ID: 7003575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Influence of the mixed inoculum on the species-identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test results by the automated microbial systems].
    Higa M; Kisanuki K; Yamane N; Nakasone I
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Apr; 56(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 18516962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Laboratory-based evaluation of a fully automated microbiology system, RAISUS for species-identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests].
    Onaga S; Yamane N; Nakasone I
    Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 2003; 14(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 14984301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus by direct inoculation from positive BACTEC blood culture bottles.
    Diederen BM; Zieltjens M; Wetten H; Buiting AG
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2006 Jan; 12(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 16460552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria that grow aerobically.
    Jorgensen JH
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 1993 Jun; 7(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 8345175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing method for analysis of sputum collected from patients with cystic fibrosis.
    Zebouh M; Thomas C; Honderlick P; Lemee L; Segonds C; Wallet F; Husson MO
    J Cyst Fibros; 2008 May; 7(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18498727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility methods: III.
    Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Goldman PJ; Goldman RJ
    Anaerobe; 2008 Apr; 14(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 18291689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Guidelines on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing in clinical microbiology laboratory in Taiwan: recommendations on grouping of bacterial isolates and minimal requirement for antimicrobial agents tested].
    Working Party for the Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of the Infectious Diseases Society of the Republic of China
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 1999 Jun; 32(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 11565567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and their role in therapeutic drug monitoring.
    DeGirolami PC; Eliopoulos G
    Clin Lab Med; 1987 Sep; 7(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 3308291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A rational approach to the selection of an antimicrobial agent.
    Hirsh DC; Ruehl WW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 185(10):1058-61. PubMed ID: 6392230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.