387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30592137)
1. Usefulness of hybrid deformable image registration algorithms in prostate radiation therapy.
Motegi K; Tachibana H; Motegi A; Hotta K; Baba H; Akimoto T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):229-236. PubMed ID: 30592137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a commercial DIR platform for contour propagation in prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT/VMAT.
Hammers JE; Pirozzi S; Lindsay D; Kaidar-Person O; Tan X; Chen RC; Das SK; Mavroidis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):14-25. PubMed ID: 32058663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deformable image registration for contour propagation from CT to cone-beam CT scans in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Thor M; Petersen JB; Bentzen L; Høyer M; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 21767192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications.
Onozato Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Arai K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Umezawa R; Matsushita H; Jingu K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 24685445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel approach for establishing benchmark CBCT/CT deformable image registrations in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Kim J; Kumar S; Liu C; Zhong H; Pradhan D; Shah M; Cattaneo R; Yechieli R; Robbins JR; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8077-97. PubMed ID: 24171908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Williamson TD; Yang J; Wisdom PG; Zhu XR; Frank SJ; Fuller CD; Gunn GB; Gao S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):92-100. PubMed ID: 31541526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of rectal dose using daily megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography and deformable image registration.
Akino Y; Yoshioka Y; Fukuda S; Maruoka S; Takahashi Y; Yagi M; Mizuno H; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(3):602-8. PubMed ID: 24074934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive evaluation of ten deformable image registration algorithms for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head & neck radiotherapy.
Li X; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wu S; Xiao Y; Gu X; Zhen X; Zhou L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175906. PubMed ID: 28414799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evaluation of a hybrid biomechanical deformable registration method on a multistage physical phantom with reproducible deformation.
Qin A; Ionascu D; Liang J; Han X; O'Connell N; Yan D
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):240. PubMed ID: 30514348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structure guided deformable image registration for treatment planning CT and post stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Primovist
Kuznetsova S; Grendarova P; Roy S; Sinha R; Thind K; Ploquin N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):109-118. PubMed ID: 31755658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy with guaranteed local rigidity constraints.
König L; Derksen A; Papenberg N; Haas B
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27647456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration.
Thörnqvist S; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen LN; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 20831491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deformable image registration and interobserver variation in contour propagation for radiation therapy planning.
Riegel AC; Antone JG; Zhang H; Jain P; Raince J; Rea A; Bergamo AM; Kapur A; Potters L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):347-357. PubMed ID: 27167289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel approach for evaluation of prostate deformation and associated dosimetric implications in IGRT of the prostate.
Mayyas E; Kim J; Kumar S; Liu C; Wen N; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091709. PubMed ID: 25186384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the performance of deformable image registration between planning CT and CBCT images for the pelvic region: comparison between hybrid and intensity-based DIR.
Takayama Y; Kadoya N; Yamamoto T; Ito K; Chiba M; Fujiwara K; Miyasaka Y; Dobashi S; Sato K; Takeda K; Jingu K
J Radiat Res; 2017 Jul; 58(4):567-571. PubMed ID: 28158642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bladder dose accumulation based on a biomechanical deformable image registration algorithm in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.
Andersen ES; Muren LP; Sørensen TS; Noe KO; Thor M; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen L; Tanderup K
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7089-100. PubMed ID: 23051686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the correlation between prostatic displacement and rectal deformation using the Dice similarity coefficient of the rectum.
Tanabe Y; Ishida T; Eto H; Sera T; Emoto Y
Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):e39-e43. PubMed ID: 30642696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
