363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30592500)
1. The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): Development, content, reliability and validity.
Clausen T; Madsen IE; Christensen KB; Bjorner JB; Poulsen OM; Maltesen T; Borg V; Rugulies R
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2019 Jul; 45(4):356-369. PubMed ID: 30592500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) - Psychometric properties of selected scales in the Polish version].
Widerszal-Bazyl M
Med Pr; 2017 May; 68(3):329-348. PubMed ID: 28512362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and Reliability of Malay Version of the Job Content Questionnaire among Public Hospital Female Nurses in Malaysia.
Amin NA; Quek KF; Oxley JA; Noah RM; Nordin R
Int J Occup Environ Med; 2015 Oct; 6(4):232-42. PubMed ID: 26498051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Work-Health-Check (WHC): a brief new tool for assessing psychosocial stress in the workplace.
Gadinger MC; Schilling O; Litaker D; Fischer JE
Work; 2012; 43(3):345-60. PubMed ID: 22927585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychosocial work environment of hospital workers: validation of a comprehensive assessment scale.
Aust B; Rugulies R; Skakon J; Scherzer T; Jensen C
Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Jul; 44(5):814-25. PubMed ID: 16542661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.
Tran TTT; Watanabe K; Imamura K; Nguyen HT; Sasaki N; Kuribayashi K; Sakuraya A; Nguyen NT; Bui TM; Nguyen QT; Truong TQ; Nguyen GTH; Minas H; Tsustumi A; Shimazu A; Kawakami N
J Occup Health; 2020 Jan; 62(1):e12157. PubMed ID: 32827229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construct validity of the Thai version of the job content questionnaire in a large population of heterogeneous occupations.
Phakthongsuk P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Apr; 92(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 19374310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Job Content Questionnaire among hospital nurses in Vietnam.
Sasaki N; Imamura K; Thuy TTT; Watanabe K; Huong NT; Kuribayashi K; Sakuraya A; Thu BM; Quynh NT; Kien NT; Nga NT; Giang NTH; Tien TQ; Minas H; Zhang M; Tsutsumi A; Kawakami N
J Occup Health; 2020 Jan; 62(1):e12086. PubMed ID: 31541525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.
Thorsen SV; Bjorner JB
Scand J Public Health; 2010 Feb; 38(3 Suppl):25-32. PubMed ID: 21172768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a short questionnaire to measure an extended set of job demands, job resources, and positive health outcomes: the new brief job stress questionnaire.
Inoue A; Kawakami N; Shimomitsu T; Tsutsumi A; Haratani T; Yoshikawa T; Shimazu A; Odagiri Y
Ind Health; 2014; 52(3):175-89. PubMed ID: 24492763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in China.
Liu J; Zhu Y; Qu B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0201177. PubMed ID: 30044881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort.
Niedhammer I
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2002 Mar; 75(3):129-44. PubMed ID: 11954980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Measurement of psychosocial factors in work environment: application of two models of occupational stress].
Yang WJ; Li J
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 22(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 15748474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the 22-item and 45-item Karasek job content questionnaire.
Phakthongsuk P; Apakupakul N
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2008; 21(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 19228579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a short version of the new brief job stress questionnaire.
Inoue A; Kawakami N; Shimomitsu T; Tsutsumi A; Haratani T; Yoshikawa T; Shimazu A; Odagiri Y
Ind Health; 2014; 52(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 24975108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment.
Kristensen TS; Hannerz H; Høgh A; Borg V
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2005 Dec; 31(6):438-49. PubMed ID: 16425585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Psychometric properties of the French version of Karasek's "Job Content Questionnaire" and its scales measuring psychological pressures, decisional latitude and social support: the results of the SUMER].
Niedhammer I; Chastang JF; Gendrey L; David S; Degioanni S
Sante Publique; 2006 Sep; 18(3):413-27. PubMed ID: 17094683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - A validation study using the Job Demand-Resources model.
Berthelsen H; Hakanen JJ; Westerlund H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196450. PubMed ID: 29708998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric Properties of the Work Well Index: A Short Questionnaire for Work-Related Stress.
Mauss D; Li J; Angerer P
Stress Health; 2017 Feb; 33(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 26916080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
