These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30592741)

  • 1. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
    Gargon E; Gorst SL; Harman NL; Smith V; Matvienko-Sikar K; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209869. PubMed ID: 30592741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.
    Davis K; Gorst SL; Harman N; Smith V; Gargon E; Altman DG; Blazeby JM; Clarke M; Tunis S; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0190695. PubMed ID: 29438429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
    Gargon E; Gorst SL; Matvienko-Sikar K; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244878. PubMed ID: 33434219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
    Gargon E; Gurung B; Medley N; Altman DG; Blazeby JM; Clarke M; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99111. PubMed ID: 24932522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research.
    Gargon E; Gorst SL; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225980. PubMed ID: 31830081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.
    Gorst SL; Gargon E; Clarke M; Blazeby JM; Altman DG; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146444. PubMed ID: 26785121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient participation impacts outcome domain selection in core outcome sets for research: an updated systematic review.
    Dodd S; Gorst SL; Young A; Lucas SW; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():127-133. PubMed ID: 37054902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps.
    Gorst SL; Gargon E; Clarke M; Smith V; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168403. PubMed ID: 27973622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review.
    Karumbi J; Gorst SL; Gathara D; Gargon E; Young B; Williamson PR
    BMJ Open; 2021 Oct; 11(10):e049981. PubMed ID: 34667005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome sets.
    Hughes KL; Kirkham JJ; Clarke M; Williamson PR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222418. PubMed ID: 31518375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irish funder guidance increased searching for, and uptake of, core outcome sets.
    Beecher C; Galvin S; Cody A; Williamson PR; Hughes K; Ward O; Creely C; Devane D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():92-98. PubMed ID: 36965599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care.
    Kearney A; Gargon E; Mitchell JW; Callaghan S; Yameen F; Williamson PR; Dodd S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():34-43. PubMed ID: 36948407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys.
    Biggane AM; Brading L; Ravaud P; Young B; Williamson PR
    Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):113. PubMed ID: 29454368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health.
    Hughes KL; Clarke M; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():114-123. PubMed ID: 32987162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Core outcomes were rarely reported overall in systematic reviews on acupuncture for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional meta-epidemiological study.
    Hu T; Long Y; Chen R; Yang Z; Liu L; Huang L; Huang J; Liao G; Du L
    Acupunct Med; 2023 Jun; 41(3):142-150. PubMed ID: 35983785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.
    Kynoch K; Chang A; Coyer F; McArdle A
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Mar; 14(3):181-234. PubMed ID: 27532144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.
    Tsertsvadze A; Maglione M; Chou R; Garritty C; Coleman C; Lux L; Bass E; Balshem H; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1208-15. PubMed ID: 21684114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.