These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059316)

  • 1. Methodological considerations for the study of multimodal signal detection.
    Stanislaw H
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Dec; 44(6):541-50. PubMed ID: 3059316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The "new look" in studies of schizophrenic attention and information processing.
    Spring B; Nuechterlein KH; Sugarman J; Matthysse S
    Schizophr Bull; 1977; 3(3):470-82. PubMed ID: 21447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring performance across sense modes: an individual differences approach.
    Tyler DM; Waag WL; Halcomb CG
    Hum Factors; 1972 Dec; 14(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 4661179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory psychophysics and perception.
    Hirsh IJ; Watson CS
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1996; 47():461-84. PubMed ID: 8624140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A deafening flash! Visual interference of auditory signal detection.
    Fassnidge C; Cecconi Marcotti C; Freeman E
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():15-24. PubMed ID: 28092861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of auditory noise on the psychophysical detection of visual signals: cross-modal stochastic resonance.
    Manjarrez E; Mendez I; Martinez L; Flores A; Mirasso CR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 415(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 17276601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reaction time as a psychophysical method in psychiatric research.
    Kietzman ML; Sutton S
    Schizophr Bull; 1977; 3(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 918572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A further test of the superposition model for the redundant-signals effect in bimodal detection.
    Diederich A; Colonius H
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 1881769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Eriksen CW
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):191-3. PubMed ID: 3405746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modality, difficulty, and "coupling" in vigilance behavior.
    Loeb M; Binford JR
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 5142063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Novelty, recency and frequency effects on visual recognition and pseudo-recognition thresholds.
    Pyke SW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):847-56. PubMed ID: 5040499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect.
    Schwarz W
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):498-500. PubMed ID: 2813037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring channel dependence in separate activation models.
    Colonius H
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Oct; 40(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 3786092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory and visual scene analysis: an overview.
    Kondo HM; van Loon AM; Kawahara JI; Moore BC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Feb; 372(1714):. PubMed ID: 28044011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metrical rhythm implicitly orients attention in time as indexed by improved target detection and left inferior parietal activation.
    Bolger D; Coull JT; Schön D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):593-605. PubMed ID: 24168222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of fluctuations of response criterion and sensitivity in a signal detection experiment.
    Wagenaar WA
    Psychol Forsch; 1973 May; 36(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 4725979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction.
    Frassinetti F; Bolognini N; Làdavas E
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 147(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 12428141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of visual and auditory knowledge of results and reward on vigilance performance.
    Grunzke ME; Kirk RE; Fischer SC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):831-6. PubMed ID: 4842439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When audiovisual correspondence disturbs visual processing.
    Hong SW; Shim WM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1325-32. PubMed ID: 26884130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time].
    Dufft CC; Ulrich R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 10067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.