BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30593434)

  • 1. Accuracy of High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner in Detecting Peri-implant Bone Defects.
    Bohner L; Habor D; Gremse F; Tortamano P; Wolfart S; Marotti J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):650-659. PubMed ID: 30593434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.
    Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Kılıç C; Yüksel S; Avsever H; Farman A; Scarfe WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(4):20130332. PubMed ID: 24645965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.
    Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Krisam J; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Sep; 29(9):922-930. PubMed ID: 30112833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
    Song D; Shujaat S; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
    Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects.
    Dave M; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 22458628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard.
    Corpas Ldos S; Jacobs R; Quirynen M; Huang Y; Naert I; Duyck J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):492-9. PubMed ID: 21143531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis.
    Bohner LOL; Mukai E; Oderich E; Porporatti AL; Pacheco-Pereira C; Tortamano P; De Luca Canto G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Oct; 124(4):432-440.e5. PubMed ID: 28743664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Periapical Radiography Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Kilovoltage Settings in the Detection of Chemically Created Peri-implant Bone Defects: An In Vitro Study.
    Pinheiro LR; Scarfe WC; de Oliveira Sales MA; Gaia BF; Cortes AR; Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):741-750. PubMed ID: 28708906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of cortical bone thickness using ultrasound.
    Degen K; Habor D; Radermacher K; Heger S; Kern JS; Wolfart S; Marotti J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 27018152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonography for noninvasive and real-time evaluation of peri-implant tissue dimensions.
    Chan HL; Sinjab K; Li J; Chen Z; Wang HL; Kripfgans OD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Aug; 45(8):986-995. PubMed ID: 29757464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Buccal Bone Surrounding Dental Implants Using a High-Frequency Ultrasound Scanner.
    Bohner L; Habor D; Tortamano P; Radermacher K; Wolfart S; Marotti J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 30940417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.
    Lan Y; Huang X; Fan M; Yu H; Xie Z; Zhou Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6347-6359. PubMed ID: 35802190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of peri-implant bone defects with different radiographic techniques - a human cadaver study.
    Kühl S; Zürcher S; Zitzmann NU; Filippi A; Payer M; Dagassan-Berndt D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 26059443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of field of view in the detection of chemically created peri-implant bone defects in bovine ribs using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Pinheiro LR; Gaia BF; Oliveira de Sales MA; Umetsubo OS; Santos Junior O; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Jul; 120(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26093682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.