288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30593673)
1. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Dong F; Wu H; Zhang L; Tian H; Liang W; Ye X; Liu Y; Xu J
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 30593673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Preliminary Comparative Study of Young's Modulus Versus Shear Modulus in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
Wu H; Liang W; Jiao Y; Song H; Peng Q; Luo H; Zhang Y; Xu J; Dong F
Ultrasound Q; 2019 Mar; 35(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 30807548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening Breast Lesions Using Shear Modulus and Its 1-mm Shell in Sound Touch Elastography.
Zhang L; Xu J; Wu H; Liang W; Ye X; Tian H; Dong F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 45(3):710-719. PubMed ID: 30638694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Tissue Stiffness Around Lesions by Sound Touch Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Malignancy Diagnosis.
Cui YY; He NA; Ye XJ; Hu L; Xie L; Zhong W; Zhang CX
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1672-1680. PubMed ID: 35672199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems.
Ren WW; Li XL; He YP; Li DD; Wang D; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW; Xu HX
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28211807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesion by sound touch elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Huang L; Ma M; Du Z; Liu Z; Gong X
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219943. PubMed ID: 31318932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography.
Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear Wave Elastography for Surgically Verified Breast Papillary Lesions: Is It Effective for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions?
Choi HJ; Ko KH; Jung HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2007-2014. PubMed ID: 28708299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses.
Lee EJ; Chang YW
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 32691540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can measuring perilesional tissue stiffness and stiff rim sign improve the diagnostic performance between benign and malignant breast lesions?
Kong WT; Wang Y; Zhou WJ; Zhang YD; Wang WP; Zhuang XM; Wu M
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 33439373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.
Tian J; Liu Q; Wang X; Xing P; Yang Z; Wu C
Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41216. PubMed ID: 28106134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
