These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059399)

  • 1. Comparison of image quality and portal vein visualization in IADSP using iopamidol, 76% urografin, and 38% urografin.
    Shibata T; Hayakawa K; Yamashita K; Hamanaka D; Okumura R; Ishi Y; Konishi J
    Radiat Med; 1988; 6(3):120-3. PubMed ID: 3059399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraarterial digital subtraction portography in patients with liver tumors.
    Itai Y; Ohtomo K; Furui S; Yashiro N; Kokubo T; Iio M
    Radiat Med; 1984; 2(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 6395211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraarterial digital subtraction arteriography in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic tumors.
    Yashiro N; Furui S; Ohtomo K; Itai Y; Iio M
    Radiat Med; 1985; 3(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 3906777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrograde visualization of the portal venous system using CO2 intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Miyazono N; Inoue H; Kanetsuki I; Nakajo M
    Abdom Imaging; 1994; 19(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 8075556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in left ventricular diastolic function after left ventriculography: a comparison with iopamidol and urografin.
    Tani M; Handa S; Noma S; Kojima S; Miyamori R; Miyazaki T; Yoshino H; Ohnishi S; Yamazaki H; Nakamura Y
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 4036787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experiment in ultra-rapid injection of isotonic sodium chloride after injection of contrast medium: time-density analysis of the aorta and portal vein].
    Itou N; Sakurada T; Kakizaki D; Abe K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Jul; 57(8):523-5. PubMed ID: 9267143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra-arterial digital angiography of the liver. Preliminary results.
    Dalla Palma L; Stacul F; Maffessanti M; Pozzi-Mucelli R
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Aug; 3(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 6628398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intra-arterial digital subtraction portography with a blood-isotonic, non-ionic, dimeric contrast medium.
    Minakuchi K; Tamaoka K; Nishio H; Matsuo R; Takada K; Morimoto A; Toyoshima M; Murata K; Onoyama Y
    Radiat Med; 1993; 11(2):43-8. PubMed ID: 8391152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improvement of IVDSA of the brachiocephalic arteries using a non-ionic contrast medium.
    Thijssen HO; Merx JL; Thijssen MA; Keyser A; Schoonderwaldt H; Wong Chung R
    Neuroradiology; 1988; 30(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 3043251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Liver CT with portal vein administration of a contrast medium].
    Schild H; Mildenberger P; Schweden F; Eckmann A; Nagel K; Knuth A; Börner N; Thelen M; Junginger T
    Rofo; 1987 Dec; 147(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 2827254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iopamidol as contrast medium in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography: a prospective randomised comparison with diatrizoate.
    O'Connor HJ; Ellis WR; Manning AP; Lintott DJ; McMahon MJ; Axon AT
    Endoscopy; 1988 Sep; 20(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 3168937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculography.
    Murdock CJ; Davis MJ; Ireland MA; Gibbons FA; Cope GD
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Mar; 19(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 2180577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
    Scherberich JE; Fischer A; Rautschka E; Kollath J; Riemann H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
    Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of "Gastromiro" for bowel opacification during computed tomography: comparison with diatrizoate and barium sulphate.
    Doyle GJ; O'Donnell SC; McDonald JR; Murthy LN; Keir MJ; Wright AR
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):681-4. PubMed ID: 7719680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transfemoral digital subtraction aortography. Are diluted high osmolar contrast media acceptable?
    Naisby GP; Owen JP; Alexander TW; Cope L; Laker MF; Hamilton PJ
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2031798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of portal venous flow augmentation on liver enhancement with CT.
    Garcia P; Bonaldi V; Bret PM; Liang L; Atri M; Reinhold C
    Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 9107650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced visualization of the portal vein system in superior mesenteric arterial portography using prostaglandin E1.
    Ito T; Itoshima T; Ukida M; Kiyotoshi S; Kawaguchi K; Ogawa H; Hattori S; Kitadai M; Nagashima H
    Acta Med Okayama; 1982 Aug; 36(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 6890302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.