These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059399)
21. Contrast material for combined abdominal and pelvic CT: can cost be reduced by increasing the concentration and decreasing the volume? Baker ME; Beam C; Leder R; Gulliver D; Paine SS; Dunnick NR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):637-41. PubMed ID: 8430570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation between portal blood iodine concentrations and radiographic visualization of the portal vein in arterial portography. Burgener FA; Gutierrez OH Invest Radiol; 1985 Jul; 20(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 4044183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Balloon-occlusion superior mesenteric arteriography for improved visualization of the mesenteric and portal venous anatomy of dogs. Phillips DA; Adams DF; Beckmann CF; Abrams HL Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 7372422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrafine needle CO2 splenoportography: a comparative investigation with transarterial portography and MR portography. Teng GJ; Deng G; Liu ZS; Fang W; Zhu GY; Li GZ; Guo JH; He SC; Dong YH Eur J Radiol; 2006 Sep; 59(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 16603330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Digital subtraction angiography of the portal venous system. Foley WD; Stewart ET; Milbrath JR; SanDretto M; Milde M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Mar; 140(3):497-9. PubMed ID: 6337462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol. Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of the electrocardiographic changes resulting from Urografin 76 and Iopamidol (Solutrast 370) during coronary angiography]. Wagner J; Werner-Schlenska H Rofo; 1984 Jul; 141(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 6431505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography. Widrich WC; Beckman CF; Robbins AH; Scholz FJ; Srinivasan MK; Hayes EJ; Kellum CD; Newman T Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 6344138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [CT portography in malignant space-occupying lesions of the liver]. Köster O; Harder T; Steudel A; Sommer HJ Rofo; 1989 Feb; 150(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 2537509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Excretion of contrast media by the immature rabbit. Comparison of Renografin and Iopamidol. Rosenbaum DM; Caldicott WJ Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6533102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children. Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. Stacul F; Carraro M; Magnaldi S; Faccini L; Guarnieri G; Dalla Palma L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dacryocystography: comparison of water-soluble and oil-based contrast agents. Munk PL; Burhenne LW; Buffam FV; Nugent RA; Lin DT Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):827-30. PubMed ID: 2554362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contrast-enhanced CT of the liver and spleen: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. Nelson RC; Chezmar JL; Peterson JE; Bernardino ME AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Nov; 153(5):973-6. PubMed ID: 2801447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with conventional arteriography]. Lackner K; Harder T; Herter M; Leipner N Rofo; 1984 Dec; 141(6):616-24. PubMed ID: 6096933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Case report: the effect of contrast density on computed tomographic arterial portography. Tarver DS; Plant GR Br J Radiol; 1995 Feb; 68(806):200-2. PubMed ID: 7735752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Parameter optimization for non-contrast-enhanced selective magnetic resonance portography imaging]. Wang X; Du SD; Xue HD; Jin ZY; Yang YY; Liu MY; Zhao XZ; Sun ZY; Jin Y; Sun HY Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2013 Jun; 35(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 23827068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media]. Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]