BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30594684)

  • 1. A principled approach to conductivity uncertainty analysis in electric field calculations.
    Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Madsen KH; Knösche TR; Weise K
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():821-834. PubMed ID: 30594684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does participant's age impact on tDCS induced fields? Insights from computational simulations.
    McCann H; Beltrachini L
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Jun; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34038881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of large structural brain changes in chronic stroke patients on the electric field caused by transcranial brain stimulation.
    Minjoli S; Saturnino GB; Blicher JU; Stagg CJ; Siebner HR; Antunes A; Thielscher A
    Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 15():106-117. PubMed ID: 28516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainty quantification in transcranial magnetic stimulation via high-dimensional model representation.
    Gomez LJ; Yücel AC; Hernandez-Garcia L; Taylor SF; Michielssen E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):361-72. PubMed ID: 25203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.
    Sharma G; Roy Chowdhury S
    J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(12):244. PubMed ID: 30374669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of uncertain head tissue conductivity in the optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation for an auditory target.
    Schmidt C; Wagner S; Burger M; Rienen Uv; Wolters CH
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046028. PubMed ID: 26170066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the electric fields of transcranial electric and magnetic perturbation.
    Sheltraw DJ; Inglis B; Labruna L; Ivry R
    J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33662947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. COMETS2: An advanced MATLAB toolbox for the numerical analysis of electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Lee C; Jung YJ; Lee SJ; Im CH
    J Neurosci Methods; 2017 Feb; 277():56-62. PubMed ID: 27989592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Thielscher A; Opitz A; Windhoff M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 20682353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The influence of tissue conductivity on the calculation of electric field in the transcranial magnetic stimulation head model].
    Niu R; Zhang C; Wu C; Lin H; Zhang G; Huo X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 40(3):401-408. PubMed ID: 37380377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of head and coil modeling for the calculation of induced electric field during transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Tachas NJ; Samaras T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul; 93(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 23872490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling.
    Caulfield KA; Badran BW; DeVries WH; Summers PM; Kofmehl E; Li X; Borckardt JJ; Bikson M; George MS
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(4):961-969. PubMed ID: 32330607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS.
    Shahid S; Wen P; Ahfock T
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Jan; 35(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 24122951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Anatomical Model and Skin Conductivity on the Electric Field Induced in the Head by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Colella M; Paffi A; Fontana S; Rossano F; De Santis V; Apollonio F; Liberti M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():2917-2920. PubMed ID: 31946501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-time computation of the TMS-induced electric field in a realistic head model.
    Stenroos M; Koponen LM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116159. PubMed ID: 31494248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of segmentation accuracy in structural MR head scans on electric field computation for TMS and tES.
    Rashed EA; Gomez-Tames J; Hirata A
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):064002. PubMed ID: 33524957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Metwally MK; Han SM; Kim TS
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Oct; 53(10):1085-101. PubMed ID: 25940845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Research on the brain phantom for transcranial electromagnetic neuromodulation].
    Wu Z; Wu N; Zhang C; Wu C; Huo X; Zhang G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 41(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 38403609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.