These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30594831)

  • 1. Patient specific glass fiber reinforced composite versus titanium plate: A comparative biomechanical analysis under cyclic dynamic loading.
    Rendenbach C; Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Heyland M; Morlock MM; Toivonen J; Moritz N; Smeets R; Heiland M; Vallittu PK; Huber G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Mar; 91():212-219. PubMed ID: 30594831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro.
    Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Polster V; Heyland M; Vollmer M; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Huber G; Rendenbach C
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 121(4):377-382. PubMed ID: 31863927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAD-CAM plates versus conventional fixation plates for primary mandibular reconstruction: A biomechanical in vitro analysis.
    Rendenbach C; Sellenschloh K; Gerbig L; Morlock MM; Beck-Broichsitter B; Smeets R; Heiland M; Huber G; Hanken H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1878-1883. PubMed ID: 28943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of titanium miniplates versus a variety of CAD/CAM plates in mandibular reconstruction.
    Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Vollmer M; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Huber G; Rendenbach C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():104007. PubMed ID: 32854074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical considerations of semi-anatomic glass fiber-reinforced (GFRC) composite implant for mandibular segmental defects: A technical note.
    Väisänen A; Hoikkala N; Härkönen V; Moritz N; Vallittu PK
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Aug; 156():106604. PubMed ID: 38810543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction.
    Steffen C; Sellenschloh K; Willsch M; Soares AP; Morlock MM; Heiland M; Kreutzer K; Huber G; Rendenbach C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Apr; 140():105742. PubMed ID: 36857975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison between stainless steel, titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone volar locking plates for distal radius fractures.
    Mugnai R; Tarallo L; Capra F; Catani F
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):877-882. PubMed ID: 29807189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing biomechanical strength of unicortical locking plate versus bicortical compression plate for transverse midshaft metacarpal fracture.
    Shanmugam R; Jian CYCCS; Haseeb A; Aik S
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(3):2309499018802511. PubMed ID: 30270746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T.
    Rendenbach C; Schoellchen M; Bueschel J; Gauer T; Sedlacik J; Kutzner D; Vallittu PK; Heiland M; Smeets R; Fiehler J; Siemonsen S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20170361. PubMed ID: 29718688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Comparison of Volar Fixed-Angle Locking Plates for AO C3 Distal Radius Fractures: Titanium Versus Stainless Steel With Compression.
    Marshall T; Momaya A; Eberhardt A; Chaudhari N; Hunt TR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Oct; 40(10):2032-8. PubMed ID: 26253601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant Material, Type of Fixation at the Shaft, and Position of Plate Modify Biomechanics of Distal Femur Plate Osteosynthesis.
    Kandemir U; Augat P; Konowalczyk S; Wipf F; von Oldenburg G; Schmidt U
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Aug; 31(8):e241-e246. PubMed ID: 28394844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of a lateral polyaxial locking plate with a posterolateral polyaxial locking plate applied to the distal fibula.
    Hallbauer J; Klos K; Rausch S; Gräfenstein A; Wipf F; Beimel C; Hofmann G; Mückley T
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Sep; 20(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 25103705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between locking and non-locking plates for fixation of metacarpal fractures in an animal model.
    Ochman S; Doht S; Paletta J; Langer M; Raschke MJ; Meffert RH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 20299161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of 4 different lateral plate constructs for distal fibula fractures.
    Eckel TT; Glisson RR; Anand P; Parekh SG
    Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Nov; 34(11):1588-95. PubMed ID: 23818460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical Properties of 3-Dimensional Printed Volar Locking Distal Radius Plate: Comparison With Conventional Volar Locking Plate.
    Kim SJ; Jo YH; Choi WS; Lee CH; Lee BG; Kim JH; Lee KH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 42(9):747.e1-747.e6. PubMed ID: 28648329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
    Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of monocortical and bicortical screw numbers on the properties of a locking plate-intramedullary rod configuration. An in vitro study on a canine femoral fracture gap model.
    Field EJ; Parsons K; Etches JA; Hamilton K; Burton NJ
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Nov; 29(6):459-465. PubMed ID: 27779272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental biomechanical study of the primary stability of different osteosynthesis systems for mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest graft.
    Grohmann I; Raith S; Kesting M; Rau A; Mücke T; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Steiner T
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):942-7. PubMed ID: 23958348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation with combined locking plate and interfragmentary screws.
    Wang SH; Wu CC; Li WT; Shen HC; Lin LC; Pan RY
    Int J Surg; 2019 May; 65():107-112. PubMed ID: 30951872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screw fixation compared to H-locking plate fixation for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: a biomechanical study.
    Cohen DA; Parks BG; Schon LC
    Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Nov; 26(11):984-9. PubMed ID: 16309614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.