These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059488)
1. [The development of digital subtraction radiography in dentistry--a review]. Brägger U Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1988; 98(11):1200-7. PubMed ID: 3059488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized image analysis in dentistry: present status and future applications. Zubery Y Compendium; 1992 Nov; 13(11):964, 966, 968, passim. PubMed ID: 1291071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography. Samarabandu J; Allen K; Hausmann E; Acharya R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 7835503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital subtraction radiography for assessing alveolar bone grafts: diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity. Maruko EY; Forbes DP Northwest Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 8148133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging in periodontology. An update. Almas K Indian J Dent Res; 1995; 6(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 9495109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved diagnosis with digital radiography. van der Stelt PF Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Dec; 2():1-6. PubMed ID: 1298452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging in the second 100 years. Frederiksen NL J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Oct; 126(10):1368-70. PubMed ID: 7594008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Changes in radiological technology research for medical imaging: from analogue to digital image studies]. JSRT Imaging Section Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jan; 70(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 24464069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A contrast-correction method for digital subtraction radiography. Ohki M; Okano T; Yamada N J Periodontal Res; 1988 Jul; 23(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 2972824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. Ruttimann UE; Webber RL; Schmidt E J Periodontal Res; 1986 Sep; 21(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 2946849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography. Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF; Ponce A; Fenesy K; Shah S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8375559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Practical usage of digital subtraction angiography--comparison between the initial and the later stage after introduction]. Hino I; Matsuno S; Hosokawa N; Miyamoto T; Sakamoto K; Kawasaki S; Seo H; Satoh K; Takashima H; Kojima K Rinsho Hoshasen; 1988 Nov; 33(12):1569-74. PubMed ID: 3065531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images. Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Research methods in dentistry. 8. Methods for longitudinally detecting differences in bone density: digital subtraction radiography]. van der Stelt PF Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Feb; 112(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 15747997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of external root resorption using digital subtraction radiography. Kravitz LH; Tyndall DA; Bagnell CP; Dove SB J Endod; 1992 Jun; 18(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 1402585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]