These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30594969)

  • 1. Mind-wandering rates fluctuate across the day: evidence from an experience-sampling study.
    Smith GK; Mills C; Paxton A; Christoff K
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2018 Dec; 3(1):54. PubMed ID: 30594969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is an off-task mind a freely-moving mind? Examining the relationship between different dimensions of thought.
    Mills C; Raffaelli Q; Irving ZC; Stan D; Christoff K
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Feb; 58():20-33. PubMed ID: 29107470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociating the freely-moving thought dimension of mind-wandering from the intentionality and task-unrelated thought dimensions.
    O'Neill K; Smith AP; Smilek D; Seli P
    Psychol Res; 2021 Oct; 85(7):2599-2609. PubMed ID: 32935185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How task-unrelated and freely moving thought relate to affect: Evidence for dissociable patterns in everyday life.
    Mills C; Porter AR; Andrews-Hanna JR; Christoff K; Colby A
    Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):1029-1040. PubMed ID: 33630626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experience sampling of the degree of mind wandering distinguishes hidden attentional states.
    Zanesco AP; Denkova E; Witkin JE; Jha AP
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104380. PubMed ID: 32863021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential relationships between thought dimensions and momentary affect in daily life.
    Thiemann RF; Mills C; Kam JWY
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jul; 87(5):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 36370193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: an experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts.
    McVay JC; Kane MJ; Kwapil TR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 19815789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.
    Kane MJ; Smeekens BA; Meier ME; Welhaf MS; Phillips NE
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Dec; 53(6):2372-2411. PubMed ID: 33835393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mind wandering and sleep in daily life: A combined actigraphy and experience sampling study.
    Marcusson-Clavertz D; Persson SD; Davidson P; Kim J; Cardeña E; Kuehner C
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Jan; 107():103447. PubMed ID: 36469956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing.
    Schubert AL; Frischkorn GT; Rummel J
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1846-1856. PubMed ID: 31049656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings.
    Kane MJ; Gross GM; Chun CA; Smeekens BA; Meier ME; Silvia PJ; Kwapil TR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1271-1289. PubMed ID: 28719760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term dynamics of mind wandering: ultradian rhythms in thought generation.
    Nakatani C; Ganschow B; van Leeuwen C
    Neurosci Conscious; 2019; 2019(1):niz007. PubMed ID: 31191982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct electrophysiological signatures of task-unrelated and dynamic thoughts.
    Kam JWY; Irving ZC; Mills C; Patel S; Gopnik A; Knight RT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(4):. PubMed ID: 33468671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands.
    Greve M; Was CA
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Aug; 103():103355. PubMed ID: 35728359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spontaneous Thought Characteristics are Differentially Related to Heightened Negative Affect vs. Blunted Positive Affect in Adolescents: An Experience Sampling Study.
    Webb CA; Tierney AO; Brown HA; Forbes EE; Pizzagalli DA; Ren B
    JCPP Adv; 2022 Dec; 2(4):. PubMed ID: 36817188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spontaneous default network activity reflects behavioral variability independent of mind-wandering.
    Kucyi A; Esterman M; Riley CS; Valera EM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(48):13899-13904. PubMed ID: 27856733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thought dynamics under task demands: Evaluating the influence of task difficulty on unconstrained thought.
    Brosowsky NP; Murray S; Schooler JW; Seli P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1298-1312. PubMed ID: 34694856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The link between mind wandering and learning in children.
    Cherry J; McCormack T; Graham AJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 May; 217():105367. PubMed ID: 35065354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration and segregation across large-scale intrinsic brain networks as a marker of sustained attention and task-unrelated thought.
    Zuberer A; Kucyi A; Yamashita A; Wu CM; Walter M; Valera EM; Esterman M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 229():117610. PubMed ID: 33418073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?
    Wiemers EA; Redick TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):367-373. PubMed ID: 30225780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.