269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059501)
1. Science and persuasion: environmental disease in U.S. courts.
Boden LI; Miyares JR; Ozonoff D
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1019-29. PubMed ID: 3059501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of legal and policy issues in legislating compensation for victims of toxic substance pollution.
Soble SM; Brennan JH
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1061-70. PubMed ID: 3059505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collective judicial management of mass toxic tort controversies: lessons and issues from the Agent Orange litigation.
Novey LB
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1071-84. PubMed ID: 3059506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A conflict between science and social concerns: Agent Orange.
Young AL
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Jan; 15(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 18306879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Specter orange.
Scott-Clark C; Levy A
Int J Health Serv; 2004; 34(3):557-66. PubMed ID: 15346687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changing legal standards for proof of causation in hazardous waste tort cases. Plaintiffs' problems and congressional responses.
Learner LG; Hartman KL; Berry DS
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1983 Dec; 4(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 6666765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compensation of pollution-related health damage in Japan.
Aronson B
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1043-52. PubMed ID: 3059503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Agent Orange: exposure and policy.
Gough M
Am J Public Health; 1991 Mar; 81(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 1994736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tobacco manufacturers' defence against plaintiffs' claims of cancer causation: throwing mud at the wall and hoping some of it will stick.
Milberger S; Davis RM; Douglas CE; Beasley JK; Burns D; Houston T; Shopland D
Tob Control; 2006 Dec; 15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv17-26. PubMed ID: 17130620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of defendant conduct on jury damage awards.
Greene E; Johns M; Smith A
J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 11393436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific information in judicial and administrative systems.
Burger EJ
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1031-41. PubMed ID: 3059502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurologic malpractice: the perspective of a patient's lawyer.
Mackauf SH
Neurol Clin; 1999 May; 17(2):345-53. PubMed ID: 10196415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
Melnick RL
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dioxin lawsuits. Agent Orange in the courts.
David P
Nature; 1983 Jul 7-13; 304(5921):6. PubMed ID: 6866088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael.
Grudzinskas AJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):482-8. PubMed ID: 10509947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expert evidence, the adversary system, and the jury.
Vidmar N
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S137-43. PubMed ID: 16030330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The twilight zone between scientific certainty and legal sufficiency: should a jury determine the causation of schizophrenia?
Goldstein RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 3427234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Matching evidence about clustered health events with tort law requirements.
Black B
Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jul; 132(1 Suppl):S79-86. PubMed ID: 2356840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proof of causation in informed consent cases: establishing what the plaintiff would have done.
Cockburn T; Madden B
J Law Med; 2010 Dec; 18(2):320-32. PubMed ID: 21355434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proving Causation With Epidemiological Evidence in Tobacco Lawsuits.
Lee SG
J Prev Med Public Health; 2016 Mar; 49(2):80-96. PubMed ID: 27055545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
