158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059502)
1. Scientific information in judicial and administrative systems.
Burger EJ
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1031-41. PubMed ID: 3059502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Science and persuasion: environmental disease in U.S. courts.
Boden LI; Miyares JR; Ozonoff D
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1019-29. PubMed ID: 3059501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compensation of pollution-related health damage in Japan.
Aronson B
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1043-52. PubMed ID: 3059503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of legal and policy issues in legislating compensation for victims of toxic substance pollution.
Soble SM; Brennan JH
Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1061-70. PubMed ID: 3059505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality.
Wagner W
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S99-106. PubMed ID: 16030346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
Cranor C
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings.
Jasanoff S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S49-58. PubMed ID: 16030338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific Evidence and Public Policy. Proceedings of a conference, 2003, Coronado, California, USA.
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S5-150. PubMed ID: 16178071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Daubert and the proper role for the courts in health, safety, and environmental regulation.
McGarity TO
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S92-8. PubMed ID: 16030345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
Berger MA
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law.
Krimsky S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S129-36. PubMed ID: 16030328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific evidence and public policy.
Michaels D
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S5-7. PubMed ID: 16030339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
Klee CH; Friedman HJ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Congress settle the abortion issue?
Segers MC
Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Jun; 12(3):20-8. PubMed ID: 7107237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
Cecil JS
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.
Haack S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Would a Federal Judicial Science Board improve toxic tort litigation?
Brennan TA
Am J Ind Med; 1990; 17(6):761-71. PubMed ID: 2343878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
