These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30595048)

  • 1. The Impact of Dust and Confinement on Fragmentation of Kidney Stones by Shockwave Lithotripsy in Tissue Phantoms.
    Randad A; Ahn J; Bailey MR; Kreider W; Harper JD; Sorensen MD; Maxwell AD
    J Endourol; 2019 May; 33(5):400-406. PubMed ID: 30595048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhu S; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 May; 28(5):661-71. PubMed ID: 12079703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence.
    Alavi Tamaddoni H; Roberts WW; Duryea AP; Cain CA; Hall TL
    J Endourol; 2016 Dec; 30(12):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 27762629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controlled cavitation to augment SWL stone comminution: mechanistic insights in vitro.
    Duryea AP; Roberts WW; Cain CA; Hall TL
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Feb; 60(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 23357904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhou Y; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):349-54. PubMed ID: 15201809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment time reduction using tandem shockwaves for lithotripsy: an in vivo study.
    Fernández F; Fernández G; Loske AM
    J Endourol; 2009 Aug; 23(8):1247-53. PubMed ID: 19580352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Rassweiler J; Rieker P; Pecha R; Dressel M; Rassweiler-Seyfried MC
    J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 34314251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced shockwave lithotripsy with active cavitation mitigation.
    Alavi Tamaddoni H; Roberts WW; Hall TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3275. PubMed ID: 31795655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Third prize: the impact of fluid environment manipulation on shockwave lithotripsy artificial calculi fragmentation rates.
    Méndez-Probst CE; Fernadez A; Erdeljan P; Vanjecek M; Cadieux PA; Razvi H
    J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):397-401. PubMed ID: 21401394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of energy density and acoustic cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Loske AM
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19819511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT Texture Analysis of Ex Vivo Renal Stones Predicts Ease of Fragmentation with Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Cui HW; Devlies W; Ravenscroft S; Heers H; Freidin AJ; Cleveland RO; Ganeshan B; Turney BW
    J Endourol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 28474533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution.
    Maloney ME; Marguet CG; Zhou Y; Kang DE; Sung JC; Springhart WP; Madden J; Zhong P; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 2006 Sep; 20(9):603-6. PubMed ID: 16999607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Previous Open Renal Stone Surgery Affect the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Treatment in Adults with Renal Stones?
    Gültekin MH; Türegün FA; Ozkan B; Tülü B; Güleç GG; Tansu N; Demirdağ Ç; Kendigelen P; Erözenci A; Önal B
    J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1295-1300. PubMed ID: 28891311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of an expansion chamber during standard and tandem extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Fernández F; Fernández G; Loske AM
    J Endourol; 2009 Apr; 23(4):693-7. PubMed ID: 19335160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.
    Pishchalnikov YA; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Pishchalnikova IV; Vonderhaar RJ
    J Endourol; 2006 Aug; 20(8):537-41. PubMed ID: 16903810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Stone Size on the Comminution Process and Efficiency in Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
    Zhang Y; Nault I; Mitran S; Iversen ES; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 42(11):2662-2675. PubMed ID: 27515177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of plain radiography in predicting renal stone fragmentation by shockwave lithotripsy in the era of noncontrast multidetector computed tomography.
    Hussein A; Anwar A; Abol-Nasr M; Ramadan E; Shaaban A
    J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):850-3. PubMed ID: 24568734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synchronous twin-pulse technique to improve efficacy of SWL: preliminary results of an experimental study.
    Sheir KZ; El-Sheikh AM; Ghoneim MA
    J Endourol; 2001 Dec; 15(10):965-74. PubMed ID: 11789977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Importance of precise imaging for stone identification during shockwave lithotripsy: a critical evaluation of "OptiVision" as a post-processing radiography imaging modality.
    Sarica K; Ferhat M; Ohara R; Parmar S
    Urolithiasis; 2022 Feb; 50(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 34528109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Triple D Score to Predict Stone-Free Status After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.
    Ozgor F; Tosun M; Kayali Y; Savun M; Binbay M; Tepeler A
    J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 27889982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.