238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30595501)
1. Evaluation of maxillary trabecular microstructure as an indicator of implant stability by using 2 cone beam computed tomography systems and micro-computed tomography.
Kulah K; Gulsahi A; Kamburoğlu K; Geneci F; Ocak M; Celik HH; Ozen T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar; 127(3):247-256. PubMed ID: 30595501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of bone microstructure in the wrist using cone-beam computed tomography.
Mys K; Stockmans F; Vereecke E; van Lenthe GH
Bone; 2018 Sep; 114():206-214. PubMed ID: 29909060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trabecular bone structural parameters evaluated using dental cone-beam computed tomography: cellular synthetic bones.
Ho JT; Wu J; Huang HL; Chen MY; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT
Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Nov; 12():115. PubMed ID: 24207062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of trabecular bone microstructural measurement at planned dental implant sites using cone-beam CT datasets.
Ibrahim N; Parsa A; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Aartman IH; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):941-5. PubMed ID: 23581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Scanning Resolution on the Prediction of Trabecular Bone Microarchitectures Using Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Tsai MT; He RT; Huang HL; Tu MG; Hsu JT
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32503153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of calcaneus trabecular microstructure measurements by HR-pQCT.
Metcalf LM; Dall'Ara E; Paggiosi MA; Rochester JR; Vilayphiou N; Kemp GJ; McCloskey EV
Bone; 2018 Jan; 106():69-77. PubMed ID: 28986143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography.
He RT; Tu MG; Huang HL; Tsai MT; Wu J; Hsu JT
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Jan; 19(1):10. PubMed ID: 30674282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation Between Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and High-Resolution Peripheral Computed Tomography for Assessment of Wrist Bone Microstructure.
Mys K; Varga P; Gueorguiev B; Hemmatian H; Stockmans F; van Lenthe GH
J Bone Miner Res; 2019 May; 34(5):867-874. PubMed ID: 30912861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of human jaw bone microarchitecture: correlation between the microarchitectural parameters of cone beam computed tomography and micro-computer tomography.
Kim JE; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Huh KH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Dec; 120(6):762-70. PubMed ID: 26548728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validating cone-beam computed tomography for peri-implant bone morphometric analysis.
Huang Y; Dessel JV; Depypere M; EzEldeen M; Iliescu AA; Santos ED; Lambrichts I; Liang X; Jacobs R
Bone Res; 2014; 2():14010. PubMed ID: 26273522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep.
Muhammad AMA; Ibrahim N; Ahmad R; Asif MK; Radzi Z; Zaini ZM; Razak HRA
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):48. PubMed ID: 32041589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of different voxel sizes on the accuracy of CBCT measurements of trabecular bone microstructure: A comparative micro-CT study.
Tayman MA; Kamburoğlu K; Ocak M; Özen D
Imaging Sci Dent; 2022 Jun; 52(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 35799972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative analysis of metal artefacts of dental implant in CBCT image by correlation analysis to micro-CT: A microstructural study.
Min CK; Kim KA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Mar; 50(3):20200365. PubMed ID: 33002369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of mandibular bone microarchitecture between micro-CT and CBCT images.
Panmekiate S; Ngonphloy N; Charoenkarn T; Faruangsaeng T; Pauwels R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140322. PubMed ID: 25564887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between microcomputed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography radiologic bone to assess atrophic posterior maxilla density and microarchitecture.
Monje A; Monje F; González-García R; Galindo-Moreno P; Rodriguez-Salvanes F; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 23442126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between dental implant stability and trabecular bone structure using cone-beam computed tomography.
Kang SR; Bok SC; Choi SC; Lee SS; Heo MS; Huh KH; Kim TI; Yi WJ
J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2016 Apr; 46(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 27127692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
