These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30596440)

  • 41. Efficacy of memory training interventions targeting metacognition for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sella E; Carbone E; Vincenzi M; Toffalini E; Borella E
    Aging Ment Health; 2023 Apr; 27(4):674-694. PubMed ID: 36218025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Reverse engineering of metacognition.
    Guggenmos M
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36107147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Metacognition and Reading: Comparing Three Forms of Metacognition in Normally Developing Readers and Readers with Dyslexia.
    Furnes B; Norman E
    Dyslexia; 2015 Aug; 21(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26234622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Domain-General and Domain-Specific Patterns of Activity Supporting Metacognition in Human Prefrontal Cortex.
    Morales J; Lau H; Fleming SM
    J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(14):3534-3546. PubMed ID: 29519851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Linking metacognition and mindreading: Evidence from autism and dual-task investigations.
    Nicholson T; Williams DM; Lind SE; Grainger C; Carruthers P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):206-220. PubMed ID: 32915016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Unskilled but subjectively aware: Metacognitive monitoring ability and respective awareness in low-performing students.
    Händel M; Fritzsche ES
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 26438233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of metacognitive training on confidence and strategic reminder setting.
    Engeler NC; Gilbert SJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240858. PubMed ID: 33095817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Atypical spatial frequency dependence of visual metacognition among schizophrenia patients.
    Koizumi A; Hori T; Maniscalco B; Hayase M; Mishima R; Kawashima T; Miyata J; Aso T; Lau H; Takahashi H; Amano K
    Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 27():102296. PubMed ID: 32599551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a non-clinical sample.
    Quiles C; Prouteau A; Verdoux H
    Encephale; 2020 Feb; 46(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31227210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Correlated individual differences suggest a common mechanism underlying metacognition in visual perception and visual short-term memory.
    Samaha J; Postle BR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Nov; 284(1867):. PubMed ID: 29167365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation.
    Fleming SM; Daw ND
    Psychol Rev; 2017 Jan; 124(1):91-114. PubMed ID: 28004960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Systematic review and meta-analysis of metacognitive abilities in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
    Rouy M; Saliou P; Nalborczyk L; Pereira M; Roux P; Faivre N
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2021 Jul; 126():329-337. PubMed ID: 33757817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Identifying cultural differences in metacognition.
    van der Plas E; Zhang S; Dong K; Bang D; Li J; Wright ND; Fleming SM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Dec; 151(12):3268-3280. PubMed ID: 35913877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Jones JS; Milton F; Mostazir M; Adlam AR
    Dev Sci; 2020 Jul; 23(4):e12870. PubMed ID: 31134713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.
    Konstantakopoulos G
    Psychiatriki; 2019; 30(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 31115349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Typological differences influence the bilingual advantage in metacognitive processing.
    Polyanskaya L; Manrique HM; Marín A; García-Palacios A; Ordin M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Nov; 151(11):2706-2719. PubMed ID: 35666891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Metacognition across domains: Is the association between arithmetic and metacognitive monitoring domain-specific?
    Bellon E; Fias W; De Smedt B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229932. PubMed ID: 32163453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of feedback on temporal error monitoring and timing behavior.
    Riemer M; Kubik V; Wolbers T
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 369():111929. PubMed ID: 31047923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The temporal dynamics of metacognition: Dissociating task-related activity from later metacognitive processes.
    Desender K; Van Opstal F; Hughes G; Van den Bussche E
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Feb; 82():54-64. PubMed ID: 26777465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neural correlates of metacognitive ability and of feeling confident: a large-scale fMRI study.
    Molenberghs P; Trautwein FM; Böckler A; Singer T; Kanske P
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 11(12):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 27445213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.