These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30597122)

  • 1. The Zero-Sum Fallacy in Evidence Evaluation.
    Pilditch TD; Fenton N; Lagnado D
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Feb; 30(2):250-260. PubMed ID: 30597122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time-Consistent?
    Tentori K; Chater N; Crupi V
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):758-78. PubMed ID: 26100936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transitive reasoning distorts induction in causal chains.
    von Sydow M; Hagmayer Y; Meder B
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Apr; 44(3):469-87. PubMed ID: 26620811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causal reasoning without mechanism.
    Dündar-Coecke S; Goldin G; Sloman SA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268219. PubMed ID: 35560140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Causality in thought.
    Sloman SA; Lagnado D
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():223-47. PubMed ID: 25061673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Trippas D; Verde MF; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):586-600. PubMed ID: 25218460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Understanding it makes it normal': is it a reasoning fallacy or not?
    Gurova L
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Jun; 19(3):524-7. PubMed ID: 23692239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intuition, reason, and metacognition.
    Thompson VA; Prowse Turner JA; Pennycook G
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Nov; 63(3):107-40. PubMed ID: 21798215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1208-15. PubMed ID: 26148720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychics, aliens, or experience? Using the Anomalistic Belief Scale to examine the relationship between type of belief and probabilistic reasoning.
    Prike T; Arnold MM; Williamson P
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():151-164. PubMed ID: 28683360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal explanation improves judgment under uncertainty, but rarely in a Bayesian way.
    Hayes BK; Ngo J; Hawkins GE; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 28905276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concreteness and abstraction in everyday explanation.
    Bechlivanidis C; Lagnado DA; Zemla JC; Sloman S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1451-1464. PubMed ID: 28497364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?
    Bialek M; Terbeck S
    Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wishful thinking in preschoolers.
    Bernard S; Clément F; Mercier H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jan; 141():267-74. PubMed ID: 26293002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structure induction in diagnostic causal reasoning.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R; Waldmann MR
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):277-301. PubMed ID: 25090421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking.
    Thompson VA; Turner JA; Pennycook G; Ball LJ; Brack H; Ophir Y; Ackerman R
    Cognition; 2013 Aug; 128(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 23158572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.