These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30597260)

  • 1. Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates.
    Cole MW; Ito T; Schultz D; Mill R; Chen R; Cocuzza C
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():1-18. PubMed ID: 30597260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity.
    Cole MW; Ito T; Cocuzza C; Sanchez-Romero R
    J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 41(12):2684-2702. PubMed ID: 33542083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying Differences Between Passive and Task-Evoked Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in a Large-Scale Brain Simulation.
    Ulloa A; Horwitz B
    Brain Connect; 2018 Dec; 8(10):637-652. PubMed ID: 30430844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations.
    Cole MW; Ito T; Bassett DS; Schultz DH
    Nat Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 19(12):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 27723746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Connectome-based predictive modeling of attention: Comparing different functional connectivity features and prediction methods across datasets.
    Yoo K; Rosenberg MD; Hsu WT; Zhang S; Li CR; Scheinost D; Constable RT; Chun MM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():11-22. PubMed ID: 29122720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Principal States of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Reveal the Link Between Resting-State and Task-State Brain: An fMRI Study.
    Cheng L; Zhu Y; Sun J; Deng L; He N; Yang Y; Ling H; Ayaz H; Fu Y; Tong S
    Int J Neural Syst; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1850002. PubMed ID: 29607681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large-scale intrinsic connectivity is consistent across varying task demands.
    Kieliba P; Madugula S; Filippini N; Duff EP; Makin TR
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0213861. PubMed ID: 30970031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modular preprocessing pipelines can reintroduce artifacts into fMRI data.
    Lindquist MA; Geuter S; Wager TD; Caffo BS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Jun; 40(8):2358-2376. PubMed ID: 30666750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward Task Connectomics: Examining Whole-Brain Task Modulated Connectivity in Different Task Domains.
    Di X; Biswal BB
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1572-1583. PubMed ID: 29931116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task modulations and clinical manifestations in the brain functional connectome in 1615 fMRI datasets.
    Kaufmann T; Alnæs D; Brandt CL; Doan NT; Kauppi K; Bettella F; Lagerberg TV; Berg AO; Djurovic S; Agartz I; Melle IS; Ueland T; Andreassen OA; Westlye LT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():243-252. PubMed ID: 27916665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causally informed activity flow models provide mechanistic insight into network-generated cognitive activations.
    Sanchez-Romero R; Ito T; Mill RD; Hanson SJ; Cole MW
    Neuroimage; 2023 Sep; 278():120300. PubMed ID: 37524170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proportional thresholding in resting-state fMRI functional connectivity networks and consequences for patient-control connectome studies: Issues and recommendations.
    van den Heuvel MP; de Lange SC; Zalesky A; Seguin C; Yeo BTT; Schmidt R
    Neuroimage; 2017 May; 152():437-449. PubMed ID: 28167349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural Basis of Large-Scale Functional Connectivity in the Mouse.
    Grandjean J; Zerbi V; Balsters JH; Wenderoth N; Rudin M
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(34):8092-8101. PubMed ID: 28716961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks.
    Whitfield-Gabrieli S; Nieto-Castanon A
    Brain Connect; 2012; 2(3):125-41. PubMed ID: 22642651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial Bayesian GLM on the cortical surface produces reliable task activations in individuals and groups.
    Spencer D; Yue YR; Bolin D; Ryan S; Mejia AF
    Neuroimage; 2022 Apr; 249():118908. PubMed ID: 35032660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State-dependent differences between functional and effective connectivity of the human cortical motor system.
    Rehme AK; Eickhoff SB; Grefkes C
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():237-46. PubMed ID: 23201364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task fMRI paradigms may capture more behaviorally relevant information than resting-state functional connectivity.
    Zhao W; Makowski C; Hagler DJ; Garavan HP; Thompson WK; Greene DJ; Jernigan TL; Dale AM
    Neuroimage; 2023 Apr; 270():119946. PubMed ID: 36801369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extendable supervised dictionary learning for exploring diverse and concurrent brain activities in task-based fMRI.
    Zhao S; Han J; Hu X; Jiang X; Lv J; Zhang T; Zhang S; Guo L; Liu T
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2018 Jun; 12(3):743-757. PubMed ID: 28600737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimising network modelling methods for fMRI.
    Pervaiz U; Vidaurre D; Woolrich MW; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116604. PubMed ID: 32062083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of nuisance removal for functional MRI of rodent brain.
    Chuang KH; Lee HL; Li Z; Chang WT; Nasrallah FA; Yeow LY; Singh KKDR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():694-709. PubMed ID: 30593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.