These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059733)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploiting the "toothpick effect" of the Cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples.
    Boon ME; Zeppa P; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Kok LP
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 1994636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
    Selvaggi SM
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies.
    Chakrabarti S; Guijon FB; Paraskevas M
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 8191818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy.
    Stillson T; Knight AL; Elswick RK
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in situ involving endocervical glands in endocervical cytobrush specimens.
    Selvaggi SM
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(5):687-92. PubMed ID: 8091898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Cell-Sweep. A new cervical cytology sampling device.
    Tyau L; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Edmonds P
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Nov; 39(11):899-902. PubMed ID: 7853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical trial comparing the Cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears.
    Koonings PP; Dickinson K; d'Ablaing G; Schlaerth JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 1635737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
    Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytologic and histologic diagnosis and significance of controversial squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Duggan MA
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 10757336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
    Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contribution of the endocervical Cytobrush sample to the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
    Luzzatto R; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(6):1143-7. PubMed ID: 8960020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears.
    Lai-Goldman M; Nieberg RK; Mulcahy D; Wiesmeier E
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.