These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059733)

  • 21. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush.
    Crouse BJ; Elliott BA; Nesin N
    Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Appraisal of self-collected cervical specimens in cytologic screening of uterine cancer.
    Arata T; Sekiba K; Kato K
    Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(3):150-2. PubMed ID: 277040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB; Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. DNA-cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Böcking A; Hilgarth M; Auffermann W; Hack-Werdier C; Fischer-Becker D; von Kalkreuth G
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 3466496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endocervical detection of CIN. Cytobrush versus cotton.
    Schettino F; Sideri M; Cangini L; Candiani M; Zannoni E; Maggi R; Ferrari A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1993; 14(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 8508881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
    Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women.
    Paraiso MF; Brady K; Helmchen R; Roat TW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center.
    Szarewski A; Curran G; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Kocjan G; Bounds W; Guillebaud J
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 8328239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
    Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?
    van Erp EJ; Dersjant-Roorda MC; Arentz NP; Stijnen T; Trimbos JB
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Oct; 30(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2572484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Upgrading unsatisfactory cervical smears with the MiB-1 method.
    Boon ME; Kleinschmidt-Guy ED; Wijsman-Grootendorst A; Hoogeveen MM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Nov; 15(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 8982579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
    Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
    Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection: a comparison of Papanicolaou and immunofluorescent staining in smears obtained by Ayre's spatula and cytobrush.
    Maeda MY; Longatto Filho A; Santos DR; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS; De Andrea Filho A
    Pathologica; 1991; 83(1083):105-9. PubMed ID: 1714070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
    Selvaggi SM; Guidos BJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions with coexisting squamous cell lesions.
    van Aspert-van Erp AJ; Smedts FM; Vooijs GP
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 102(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15368313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
    Smith-Levitin M; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.