77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3059734)
1. Scrape cytology assessment of margins of lumpectomy specimens in breast cancer.
Gal R
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(6):838-9. PubMed ID: 3059734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.
Ku NN; Cox CE; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 1718113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-operative assessment of excision margins using breast imprint and scrape cytology.
Muttalib M; Tai CC; Briant-Evans T; Maheswaran I; Livni N; Shousha S; Sinnett HD
Breast; 2005 Feb; 14(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15695080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.
D'Halluin F; Tas P; Rouquette S; Bendavid C; Foucher F; Meshba H; Blanchot J; Coué O; Levêque J
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 19515566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.
Weinberg E; Cox C; Dupont E; White L; Ebert M; Greenberg H; Diaz N; Vercel V; Centeno B; Cantor A; Nicosia S
Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15474425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of excision margins following wide local excision for breast carcinoma using specimen scrape cytology and tumour bed biopsy.
England DW; Chan SY; Stonelake PS; Lee MJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1994 Aug; 20(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 8076703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
Obedian E; Haffty BG
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determinants of positive histologic margins and residual tumor after lumpectomy for early breast cancer: a prospective study with special reference to touch preparation cytology.
Saarela AO; Paloneva TK; Rissanen TJ; Kiviniemi HO
J Surg Oncol; 1997 Dec; 66(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 9425328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient age and positive margins are predictive factors of residual tumor on mastectomy specimen after conservative treatment for breast cancer.
Voguet L; Hébert T; Levêque J; Acker O; Mesbah H; Marret H; Porée P; Body G
Breast; 2009 Aug; 18(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 19628389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Touch preparation cytology of breast lumpectomy margins with histologic correlation.
Cox CE; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV; Wangensteen S
Arch Surg; 1991 Apr; 126(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 2009065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal carcinoma in situ. The success of breast conservation therapy: a shared experience of two single institutional nonrandomized prospective studies.
Lagios MD; Silverstein MJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 9115503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
