These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 305982)
21. Impact of internal mammary artery conduit on long-term outcomes after percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft. Mehta RH; Honeycutt E; Peterson ED; Granger CB; Halabi AR; Shaw LK; Smith PK; Califf RM; Harrington RA; Sketch MH Circulation; 2006 Jul; 114(1 Suppl):I396-401. PubMed ID: 16820607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Free internal mammary artery for coronary bypass. Vidne BA; Lee AB; Lajos TZ; Schimert G Thorax; 1976 Apr; 31(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 1085042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Flow-induced vasomotor response to tachycardia of the human internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts late following bypass surgery. Hanet C; Schroeder E; Michel X; Cosyns J; Dion R; Verhelst R; Wijns W Circulation; 1991 Nov; 84(5 Suppl):III268-74. PubMed ID: 1934419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bypass grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery: saphenous vein versus internal mammary artery. Tyras DH; Barner HB; Kaiser GC; Codd JE; Pennington DG; Willman VL J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Sep; 80(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 6968006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery. No difference in 1-year occlusion rates and clinical outcome. CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands. van der Meer J; Hillege HL; van Gilst WH; Brutel de la Rivière A; Dunselman PH; Fidler V; Kootstra GJ; Mulder BJ; Pfisterer M; Lie KI Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5):2367-74. PubMed ID: 7955195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vasomotor response to ergometrine and nitrates of saphenous vein grafts, internal mammary artery grafts, and grafted coronary arteries late after bypass surgery. Hanet C; Robert A; Wijns W Circulation; 1992 Nov; 86(5 Suppl):II210-6. PubMed ID: 1424002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bilateral internal mammary artery for coronary revascularization. Early experience of 100 cases. Henze A; Ramström J; Nyström SO Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989; 23(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2786250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Coronary bypass surgery utilizing an internal mammary artery and autologous saphenous vein graft for mitral valve replacement in severe Kawasaki heart disease: report of a case]. Kitamura S; Oyama C; Kawachi K; Miyagi Y; Morita R; Kim K; Nishii T; Nabuchi A; Kobayashi S Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 32(11):1996-2003. PubMed ID: 6335519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Flow capacity of internal mammary artery grafts: early restriction and later improvement assessed by Doppler guide wire. Comparison with saphenous vein grafts. Akasaka T; Yoshikawa J; Yoshida K; Maeda K; Hozumi T; Nasu M; Shomura T J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Mar; 25(3):640-7. PubMed ID: 7860908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Vasoactive drug effects on blood flow in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts. Jett GK; Arcidi JM; Dorsey LM; Hatcher CR; Guyton RA J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 3110506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The saphenous vein versus internal mammary artery as a coronary bypass graft. Angell WW; Sywak A Circulation; 1977 Sep; 56(3 Suppl):II22-5. PubMed ID: 301797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Multiple grafts of the internal mammary artery in coronary surgery]. Durán E; Rivera R; Ajuria M; Navia J; Pousibet H; Serrano G; Acedo JM Rev Esp Cardiol; 1986; 39(6):430-4. PubMed ID: 3493510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Bilateral internal thoracic artery operations in the elderly. Jones JW; Schmidt SE; Miller CC; Beall AC; Baldwin JC J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2000 Apr; 41(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 10901516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Important anatomical and physiological considerations in performance of complex mammary-coronary artery operations. Jones EL; Lattouf O; Lutz JF; King SB Ann Thorac Surg; 1987 May; 43(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 3555366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Internal thoracic artery grafts: 20-year clinical follow-up. Cameron AA; Green GE; Brogno DA; Thornton J J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 Jan; 25(1):188-92. PubMed ID: 7798499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term results of reoperations for recurrent angina with internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein grafts. Dougenis D; Brown AH Heart; 1998 Jul; 80(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 9764051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery: prospective randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Zeff RH; Kongtahworn C; Iannone LA; Gordon DF; Brown TM; Phillips SJ; Skinner JR; Spector M Ann Thorac Surg; 1988 May; 45(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 3259128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Internal mammary artery bypass: thirteen years of experience. Influence of angina and survival in 5125 patients. Acinapura AJ; Jacobowitz IJ; Kramer MD; Zisbrod Z; Cunningham JN J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1992; 33(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 1447272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]