These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30598306)

  • 1. The effect of conventional, half-digital, and full-digital fabrication techniques on the retention and apical gap of post and core restorations.
    Hendi AR; Moharrami M; Siadat H; Hajmiragha H; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):364.e1-364.e6. PubMed ID: 30598306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of half-digital workflows on the adaptation of custom CAD-CAM composite post-and-cores.
    Perucelli F; Goulart da Costa R; Machado de Souza E; Rached RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):756-762. PubMed ID: 33127081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of CAD/CAM fabricated fiber posts in oval-shaped root canals: An in vitro study.
    Tsintsadze N; Juloski J; Carrabba M; Tricarico M; Goracci C; Vichi A; Ferrari M; Grandini S
    Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):248-254. PubMed ID: 29178727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Accuracy of Post and Core Fabricated with Digital Technology.
    Piangsuk T; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Lindquist TJ
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):221-226. PubMed ID: 35413146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of impression technique on the fabrication of cast metal posts.
    de Moraes AP; Poletto Neto V; Boscato N; Pereira-Cenci T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 26868965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
    Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation and Retention of Conventional and Digitally Fabricated Posts and Cores in Round and Oval-Shaped Canals.
    Jafarian Z; Moharrami M; Sahebi M; Alikhasi M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 31860918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital impressions in dentistry-accuracy of impression digitalisation by desktop scanners.
    Runkel C; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 31302771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Pradíes G; Zarauz C; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Martínez-Rus F
    J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 25527248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.