These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30598665)
1. Trueness and Precision of Three-Dimensional Digitizing Intraoral Devices. Mutwalli H; Braian M; Mahmood D; Larsson C Int J Dent; 2018; 2018():5189761. PubMed ID: 30598665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. Braian M; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study. Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study. Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners. Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. Diker B; Tak Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In Vitro Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners in a Four-Implant Complete-Arch Model. Spagopoulos D; Kaisarlis G; Spagopoulou F; Halazonetis DJ; Güth JF; Papazoglou E Dent J (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36661564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Lerner H; Rutkunas V; Mangano C BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):263. PubMed ID: 32962680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies. Kim RJY; Benic GI; Park JM Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2606. PubMed ID: 33510317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns. Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study. Mangano FG; Veronesi G; Hauschild U; Mijiritsky E; Mangano C PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163107. PubMed ID: 27684723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the accuracy of seven intraoral scanners for the full dentate and partially edentulous complete-arch mandibular casts: An Wang X; Zhang F; Ma D; Ye X; Zheng X; Ren R; Ren N; Bai S Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31063. PubMed ID: 38803930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro study of the accuracy and efficiency of wireless intraoral scanners at various battery levels. Sombun S; Ongthiemsak C J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104686. PubMed ID: 37666467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Accuracy analysis of full-arch implant digital impressions when using a geometric feature]. Ke YF; Zhang YP; Chen JK; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 57(2):162-167. PubMed ID: 35152652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]