These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30598665)

  • 21. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine.
    Revilla-León M; Att W; Özcan M; Rubenstein J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 32386912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
    Kim RJ; Park JM; Shim JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):895-903.e1. PubMed ID: 30006228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting.
    Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro evaluation of the impact of intraoral scanner, scanning aids, and the scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches.
    Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38953541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trueness of intraoral scanners in digitizing specific locations at the margin and intaglio surfaces of intracoronal preparations.
    Jin-Young Kim R; Benic GI; Park JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 33176925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners:
    Kwon M; Cho Y; Kim DW; Kim M; Kim YJ; Chang M
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 33678625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device.
    Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Etxaniz O; Solaberrieta E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 30554826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of scanning protocol on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study.
    Hamilton A; Negreiros WM; Jain S; Finkelman M; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jun; 35(6):641-651. PubMed ID: 38567801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method.
    Dupagne L; Tapie L; Lebon N; Mawussi B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 33781577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gurpinar B; Tak O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study.
    Revilla-León M; Agustín-Panadero R; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36682896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form.
    Park JM
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Oct; 8(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 27826385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis.
    Tian J; Jung RE; Han Y; Mei Y; Di P
    J Dent; 2024 Aug; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of apical finish line location of tooth preparations on the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners with various focal lengths and scanning technologies.
    Revilla-León M; Fry E; Zeitler JM; Li J; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39153939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.