These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30598665)
41. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence. Diker B; Tak Ö J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 12(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 33149851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of connected and nonconnected calibrated frameworks on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans obtained by using four intraoral scanners, a desktop scanner, and a photogrammetry system. Revilla-León M; Barmak AB; Lanis A; Kois JC J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38443245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans. Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32643259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. Lim JH; Park JM; Kim M; Heo SJ; Myung JY J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 28689906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effects of the intraoral scanner and implant library on the trueness of digital impressions in the full-arch implant scan: A comparative in vitro study. Hauschild U; Lerner H; Weigl P; Porrà T; Admakin O; Mangano FG J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105336. PubMed ID: 39260468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position. Kim RJ; Benic GI; Park JM PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0222070. PubMed ID: 31743331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Trueness Evaluation of Latest Generation of Intraoral Scanners on Complete-Arch Implant Impressions. İşsever DŞA; Değer Sİ Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; 36(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 37699176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Scan accuracy of wireless intraoral scanners while digitizing a combined scan body-healing abutment system. Dinçer G; Molinero-Mourelle P; Dönmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Yilmaz B; Çakmak G J Dent; 2024 Oct; 151():105413. PubMed ID: 39419370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):575-580. PubMed ID: 31870612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Coordinate-based data analysis of the accuracy of five intraoral scanners for scanning completely dentate and partially edentulous mandibular arches. Wang X; Zhang F; Ma D; Ye X; Zheng X; Ren R; Bai S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38342644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria. Róth I; Czigola A; Fehér D; Vitai V; Joós-Kovács GL; Hermann P; Borbély J; Vecsei B BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):140. PubMed ID: 35473932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of Different Intraoral Scanners With Prefabricated Aid on Accuracy and Framework Passive Fit of Digital Complete-Arch Implant Impression: An In Vitro Study. Fu XJ; Liu M; Shi JY; Deng K; Lai HC; Gu W; Zhang XM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39233386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Accuracy of intraoral scanning in completely and partially edentulous maxillary and mandibular jaws: an in vitro analysis. Schimmel M; Akino N; Srinivasan M; Wittneben JG; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1839-1847. PubMed ID: 32812098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study. Iturrate M; Lizundia E; Amezua X; Solaberrieta E J Adv Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 11(6):331-340. PubMed ID: 31897272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. Patzelt SB; Vonau S; Stampf S; Att W J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Aug; 144(8):914-20. PubMed ID: 23904578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners. Amornvit P; Rokaya D; Sanohkan S Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():2673040. PubMed ID: 34552983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions. Rutkunas V; Gedrimiene A; Akulauskas M; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Jegelevicius D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1444-1454. PubMed ID: 34543478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]