274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30599085)
21. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of plan quality assurance models for prostate cancer patients based on fully automatically generated Pareto-optimal treatment plans.
Wang Y; Breedveld S; Heijmen B; Petit SF
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(11):4268-82. PubMed ID: 27203748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Real-Time Peer Review Quality Assurance Rounds Incorporating Direct Physical Examination for Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy.
Cardenas CE; Mohamed ASR; Tao R; Wong AJR; Awan MJ; Kuruvila S; Aristophanous M; Gunn GB; Phan J; Beadle BM; Frank SJ; Garden AS; Morrison WH; Fuller CD; Rosenthal DI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):532-540. PubMed ID: 28258898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical implementation and error sensitivity of a 3D quality assurance protocol for prostate and thoracic IMRT.
Gueorguiev G; Cotter C; Turcotte JC; Crawford B; Sharp G; Mah'D M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):179–192. PubMed ID: 26699299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of spatial resolution and noise on gamma analysis for IMRT QA.
Huang JY; Pulliam KB; McKenzie EM; Followill DS; Kry SF
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4690. PubMed ID: 25207399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Knowledge-based dose prediction models for head and neck cancer are strongly affected by interorgan dependency and dataset inconsistency.
Wang Y; Heijmen BJM; Petit SF
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):934-943. PubMed ID: 30506855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers.
Prior P; Chen X; Botros M; Paulson ES; Lawton C; Erickson B; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3819-42. PubMed ID: 27089554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cone beam CT for QA of synthetic CT in MRI only for prostate patients.
Palmér E; Persson E; Ambolt P; Gustafsson C; Gunnlaugsson A; Olsson LE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):44-52. PubMed ID: 30182461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Wu B; Ricchetti F; Sanguineti G; Kazhdan M; Simari P; Jacques R; Taylor R; McNutt T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Mar; 79(4):1241-7. PubMed ID: 20800382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems.
Hussein M; Rowshanfarzad P; Ebert MA; Nisbet A; Clark CH
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 24100148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes of Routine Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance in a Large Head and Neck Cancer Center.
Amarasena I; Herschtal A; D'Costa I; Fua T; Tiong A; Geddes V; Tran P; Liu C; Corry J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jul; 98(3):541-546. PubMed ID: 28581395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Varian DynaLog file-based procedure for patient dose-volume histogram-based IMRT QA.
Calvo-Ortega JF; Teke T; Moragues S; Pozo M; Casals-Farran J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4665. PubMed ID: 24710455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA.
Aristophanous M; Suh Y; Chi PC; Whittlesey LJ; LaNeave S; Martel MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):20-33. PubMed ID: 27685107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sensitivity of volumetric modulated arc therapy patient specific QA results to multileaf collimator errors and correlation to dose volume histogram based metrics.
Coleman L; Skourou C
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111715. PubMed ID: 24320423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Machine Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of VMAT: Prediction and Classification Accuracy.
Li J; Wang L; Zhang X; Liu L; Li J; Chan MF; Sui J; Yang R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Nov; 105(4):893-902. PubMed ID: 31377162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The evolution of quality assurance for intensity- modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): sequential tomotherapy.
Woo SY; Grant W; McGary JE; Teh BS; Butler EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 May; 56(1):274-86. PubMed ID: 12694849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the insensitivity of single field planar dosimetry to IMRT inaccuracies.
Kruse JJ
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2516-24. PubMed ID: 20632563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinically relevant quality assurance (QA) for prostate RapidArc plans: gamma maps and DVH-based evaluation.
Cozzolino M; Oliviero C; Califano G; Clemente S; Pedicini P; Caivano R; Chiumento C; Fiorentino A; Fusco V
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 24480527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of MLC error sensitivity of various commercial devices for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance.
Saito M; Sano N; Shibata Y; Kuriyama K; Komiyama T; Marino K; Aoki S; Ashizawa K; Yoshizawa K; Onishi H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):87-93. PubMed ID: 29500857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
