These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30599293)

  • 1. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J; Kiesel A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):699-715. PubMed ID: 29524178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-switching costs disappear if non-Chinese participants respond to Chinese characters.
    Li X; Li B; Liu X; Lages M; Stoet G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2051-2071. PubMed ID: 30730179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phasic alertness and residual switch costs in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):317-327. PubMed ID: 27831719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. You can't always get what you want: the influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching.
    Weaver SM; Foxe JJ; Shpaner M; Wylie GR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2247-59. PubMed ID: 24916773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociable theta networks underlie the switch and mixing costs during task switching.
    McKewen M; Cooper PS; Skippen P; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Karayanidis F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(14):4643-4657. PubMed ID: 34184803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-switching costs have distinct phase-locked and nonphase-locked EEG power effects.
    McKewen M; Cooper PS; Wong ASW; Michie PT; Sauseng P; Karayanidis F
    Psychophysiology; 2020 May; 57(5):e13533. PubMed ID: 31994736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability.
    Seibold JC; Nolden S; Oberem J; Fels J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1382-1395. PubMed ID: 28631530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinct neurophysiological mechanisms mediate mixing costs and switch costs.
    Wylie GR; Murray MM; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 18476759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance.
    Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1346-1369. PubMed ID: 30725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task practice differentially modulates task-switching performance across the adult lifespan.
    Whitson LR; Karayanidis F; Michie PT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 22000521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of response requirements in task switching: dissolving the residue.
    Wylie GR; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Neuroreport; 2004 Apr; 15(6):1079-87. PubMed ID: 15076739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorrect predictions reduce switch costs.
    Kleinsorge T; Scheil J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():52-60. PubMed ID: 26024967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of performing versus preparing a task on the subsequent switch cost.
    Swainson R; Prosser L; Karavasilev K; Romanczuk A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):364-383. PubMed ID: 31624918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partitioning switch costs when investigating task switching in relation to media multitasking.
    Schneider DW; Chun H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):910-917. PubMed ID: 33634358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.