129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30599681)
1. Railway noise annoyance modeling: Accounting for noise sensitivity and different acoustical features.
Vallin PA; Marquis-Favre C; Bleuse J; Gille LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Dec; 144(6):3381. PubMed ID: 30599681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noise sensitivity and loudness derivative index for urban road traffic noise annoyance computation.
Gille LA; Marquis-Favre C; Weber R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4307. PubMed ID: 28040048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing of the European Union exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model for annoyance due to transportation noises: The need of revised exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model.
Gille LA; Marquis-Favre C; Morel J
Environ Int; 2016 Sep; 94():83-94. PubMed ID: 27223699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-Term Annoyance Due to Night-Time Road, Railway, and Air Traffic Noise: Role of the Noise Source, the Acoustical Metric, and Non-Acoustical Factors.
Weidenfeld S; Sanok S; Fimmers R; Puth MT; Aeschbach D; Elmenhorst EM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33925579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spectral and modulation indices for annoyance-relevant features of urban road single-vehicle pass-by noises.
Klein A; Marquis-Favre C; Weber R; Trollé A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1238-50. PubMed ID: 25786937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Railway noise annoyance: exposure-response relationships and testing a theoretical model by structural equation analysis.
Pennig S; Schady A
Noise Health; 2014; 16(73):388-99. PubMed ID: 25387535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of annoyance due to urban road traffic noise combined with tramway noise.
Klein A; Marquis-Favre C; Champelovier P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):231. PubMed ID: 28147615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Annoyance from Railway Noise and Railway Vibration.
Ögren M; Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A; Smith M; Gustavsson S; Persson Waye K
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 28753921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Simulated Environment Experiment on Annoyance Due to Combined Road Traffic and Industrial Noises.
Marquis-Favre C; Morel J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Jul; 12(7):8413-33. PubMed ID: 26197326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Annoyance and activity disturbance induced by high-speed railway and conventional railway noise: a contrastive case study.
Di GQ; Lin QL; Li ZG; Kang J
Environ Health; 2014 Mar; 13(1):12. PubMed ID: 24602397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Partial and Total Annoyance Due to Road Traffic Noise Combined with Aircraft or Railway Noise: Structural Equation Analysis.
Gille LA; Marquis-Favre C; Lam KC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Nov; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 29189751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examining nocturnal railway noise and aircraft noise in the field: sleep, psychomotor performance, and annoyance.
Elmenhorst EM; Pennig S; Rolny V; Quehl J; Mueller U; Maaß H; Basner M
Sci Total Environ; 2012 May; 424():48-56. PubMed ID: 22444069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of acoustical and non-acoustical factors on short-term annoyance due to aircraft noise in the field - The COSMA study.
Bartels S; Márki F; Müller U
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 538():834-43. PubMed ID: 26342903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relation between psychoacoustical factors and annoyance under different noise reduction conditions for railway noise.
Kasess CH; Maly T; Majdak P; Waubke H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3151. PubMed ID: 28599526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of field psychoacoustic indices and predictive annoyance models for road traffic noise combined with aircraft noise.
Gille LA; Marquis-Favre C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2294. PubMed ID: 31046307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Annoyance and self-reported sleep disturbance due to night-time railway noise examined in the field.
Pennig S; Quehl J; Mueller U; Rolny V; Maass H; Basner M; Elmenhorst EM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3109-17. PubMed ID: 23145596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustical, sensory, and psychological research data and procedures for their use in predicting effects of environmental noises.
Kryter KD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2601-14. PubMed ID: 18189552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors.
Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A; Ögren M; Jerson T; Öhrström E
Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):190-201. PubMed ID: 22918150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between railway noise and community annoyance in Korea.
Lim C; Kim J; Hong J; Lee S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2037-42. PubMed ID: 17069301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined Effects of High-Speed Railway Noise and Ground Vibrations on Annoyance.
Yokoshima S; Morihara T; Sato T; Yano T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Jul; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 28749452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
