203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30599846)
1. Characterization of prostate cancer using diffusion tensor imaging: A new perspective.
Gholizadeh N; Greer PB; Simpson J; Denham J; Lau P; Dowling J; Hondermarck H; Ramadan S
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():112-120. PubMed ID: 30599846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of gleason scores with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Li L; Margolis DJ; Deng M; Cai J; Yuan L; Feng Z; Min X; Hu Z; Hu D; Liu J; Wang L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):460-7. PubMed ID: 25469909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T.
Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Luo X; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 23892233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Discriminating Between Benign Tissue, Low and High Gleason Grade Prostate Cancer.
Di Trani MG; Nezzo M; Caporale AS; De Feo R; Miano R; Mauriello A; Bove P; Manenti G; Capuani S
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1328-1337. PubMed ID: 30545680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.
Lanzafame S; Giannelli M; Garaci F; Floris R; Duggento A; Guerrisi M; Toschi N
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2464. PubMed ID: 27147357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 Tesla.
Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Liu M; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):813-7. PubMed ID: 21586608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Zoomed echo-planar diffusion tensor imaging for MR tractography of the prostate gland neurovascular bundle without an endorectal coil: a feasibility study.
Ream JM; Glielmi C; Lazar M; Campbell N; Pfeuffer J; Schneider R; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 May; 41(5):919-25. PubMed ID: 27193790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation With Electrophysiology.
Kronlage M; Pitarokoili K; Schwarz D; Godel T; Heiland S; Yoon MS; Bendszus M; Bäumer P
Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):701-707. PubMed ID: 28574858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: Preliminary experience.
Manenti G; Capuani S; Fanucci E; Assako EP; Masala S; Sorge R; Iundusi R; Tarantino U; Simonetti G
Bone; 2013 Jul; 55(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23507402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mean diffusivity discriminates between prostate cancer with grade group 1&2 and grade groups equal to or greater than 3.
Nezzo M; Di Trani MG; Caporale A; Miano R; Mauriello A; Bove P; Capuani S; Manenti G
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1794-1801. PubMed ID: 27666618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing a diffusion tensor and non-tensor approach to white matter fiber tractography in chronic stroke.
Auriat AM; Borich MR; Snow NJ; Wadden KP; Boyd LA
Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 7():771-81. PubMed ID: 25844329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer: correlation of intravoxel incoherent motion MR parameters with Gleason score.
Yang DM; Kim HC; Kim SW; Jahng GH; Won KY; Lim SJ; Oh JH
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 27133684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.
Manenti G; Carlani M; Mancino S; Colangelo V; Di Roma M; Squillaci E; Simonetti G
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):412-9. PubMed ID: 17507813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of diffusion tensor imaging metrics for gliomas grading at 3 T.
Server A; Graff BA; Josefsen R; Orheim TE; Schellhorn T; Nordhøy W; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):e156-65. PubMed ID: 24457139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic value of using combined MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters to differentiate between low- and high-grade meningioma.
Aslan K; Gunbey HP; Tomak L; Incesu L
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1088):20180088. PubMed ID: 29770735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of diffusion tensor imaging and fractional anisotropy in the evaluation of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a literature review.
Siasios I; Kapsalaki EZ; Fountas KN; Fotiadou A; Dorsch A; Vakharia K; Pollina J; Dimopoulos V
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Sep; 41(3):E12. PubMed ID: 27581308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using the Ratio of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures.
Onay A; Ertas G; Vural M; Acar O; Saglican Y; Coskun B; Akpek S
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2017; 2017():5678350. PubMed ID: 29097929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of diffusion tensor imaging parameters and Gleason scores of prostate cancer.
Tian W; Zhang J; Tian F; Shen J; Niu T; He G; Yu H
Exp Ther Med; 2018 Jan; 15(1):351-356. PubMed ID: 29250155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
