202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30601043)
1. Higher 30-day mortality associated with the use of intramedullary nails compared with sliding hip screws for the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures: a prospective national registry study.
Whitehouse MR; Berstock JR; Kelly MB; Gregson CL; Judge A; Sayers A; Chesser TJ
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jan; 101-B(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 30601043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
Grønhaug KML; Dybvik E; Matre K; Östman B; Gjertsen JE
Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):274-282. PubMed ID: 35094569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison and analysis of reoperations in two different treatment protocols for trochanteric hip fractures - postoperative technical complications with dynamic hip screw, intramedullary nail and Medoff sliding plate.
Paulsson J; Stig JC; Olsson O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):364. PubMed ID: 28836973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do intramedullary implants improve survival in elderly patients with trochanteric fractures? A retrospective study.
Vermesan D; Prejbeanu R; Poenaru DV; Petrescu H; Apostol E; Inchingolo F; Dipalma G; Abbinante A; Caprio M; Potenza MA; Cagiano R; Malcangi G; Inchingolo AD; Haragus H
Clin Ter; 2015; 166(3):e140-5. PubMed ID: 26152622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sliding hip screw versus intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures; a randomised trial of 1000 patients with presentation of results related to fracture stability.
Parker MJ
Injury; 2017 Dec; 48(12):2762-2767. PubMed ID: 29102044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Equivalent mortality after operation with sliding hip screw or intramedullary nail for trochanteric AO/OTA A1 and A2 fractures reported in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2008 to 2020.
Ahmad A; Egeland EH; Dybvik EH; Gjertsen JE; Lie SA; Fenstad AM; Matre K; Furnes O
Bone Joint J; 2024 Jun; 106-B(6):603-612. PubMed ID: 38821494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up.
Matre K; Vinje T; Havelin LI; Gjertsen JE; Furnes O; Espehaug B; Kjellevold SH; Fevang JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Feb; 95(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 23389782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A newly designed locked intramedullary nail for trochanteric hip fractures fixation: results of the first 100 Trochanteric implantations.
Loubignac F; Chabas JF
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Apr; 95(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19345659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A five-year review comparing 30-day mortality following intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw for trochanteric hip fractures.
Lynch Wong M; Baker G; McCusker D; Zhang SD; Charlwood AP
Injury; 2022 Jun; 53(6):2189-2194. PubMed ID: 35307167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: a randomised trial of 600 fractures.
Parker MJ; Bowers TR; Pryor GA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 22371549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-invasive nail versus DHS to fix pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study.
Foulongne E; Gilleron M; Roussignol X; Lenoble E; Dujardin F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):592-8. PubMed ID: 19945367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intramedullary nails versus sliding hip screws for AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures in adults: A meta-analysis.
Zhu Q; Xu X; Yang X; Chen X; Wang L; Liu C; Lin P
Int J Surg; 2017 Jul; 43():67-74. PubMed ID: 28549994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Condylocephalic nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH; Bhonsle S; Gillespie WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; 1998(2):CD000338. PubMed ID: 10796346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased use of intramedullary nails for intertrochanteric proximal femoral fractures in veterans affairs hospitals: a comparative effectiveness study.
Radcliff TA; Regan E; Cowper Ripley DC; Hutt E
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(9):833-40. PubMed ID: 22552673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: a randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail.
Saudan M; Lübbeke A; Sadowski C; Riand N; Stern R; Hoffmeyer P
J Orthop Trauma; 2002 Jul; 16(6):386-93. PubMed ID: 12142826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register.
Mattisson L; Bojan A; Enocson A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Oct; 19(1):369. PubMed ID: 30314495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
Aktselis I; Kokoroghiannis C; Fragkomichalos E; Koundis G; Deligeorgis A; Daskalakis E; Vlamis J; Papaioannou N
Int Orthop; 2014 Jan; 38(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 24318319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sliding hip screw
Parker MJ; Cawley S
Bone Joint J; 2017 Sep; 99-B(9):1210-1215. PubMed ID: 28860402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD004961. PubMed ID: 16856070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
