These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30601777)

  • 21. A rubric for grading or editing student papers.
    Daggett LM
    Nurse Educ; 2008; 33(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 18317312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High time for a change: psychometric analysis of multiple-choice questions in nursing.
    Redmond SP; Hartigan-Rogers JA; Cobbett S
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2012 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 23192053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evaluation of students' reflective writing for evidence of critical thinking.
    Kennison MM
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 17036685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Classification of teacher written comments on student assignments.
    Lutz EM
    J Nurs Educ; 1989 May; 28(5):227-9. PubMed ID: 2542497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Writing multiple-choice test items that promote and measure critical thinking.
    Morrison S; Free KW
    J Nurs Educ; 2001 Jan; 40(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11198905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiple choice testing.
    Conklin J; Serra N
    N J Nurse; 1997 Mar; 27(2):6. PubMed ID: 9325890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Professional writing in nursing education: creating an academic-community writing center.
    Latham CL; Ahern N
    J Nurs Educ; 2013 Nov; 52(11):615-20. PubMed ID: 24127176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Writing-skills development in the health professions.
    Rawson RE; Quinlan KM; Cooper BJ; Fewtrell C; Matlow JR
    Teach Learn Med; 2005; 17(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16042518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Students. Creating the write stuff.
    Fowler J
    Nurs Times; 1996 Jul 31-Aug 6; 92(31):59-61. PubMed ID: 8826338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Multiple choice as examination system in nursing].
    Joehle A; Malangré B
    Krankenpflege (Frankf); 1981 Feb; 35(2):79. PubMed ID: 6782367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Writing good multiple-choice questions: a brief guide for radiologists.
    DiSantis DJ
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(7):1865-6. PubMed ID: 24224583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single best answer question-writing tips for clinicians.
    Walsh JL; Harris BH; Smith PE
    Postgrad Med J; 2017 Feb; 93(1096):76-81. PubMed ID: 27371033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A framework for improving the quality of multiple-choice assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Nurse Educ; 2012; 37(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 22513766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Education. 2. Are multiple choice examinations fair?
    Owen R
    Nurs Mirror; 1983 Sep; 157(13):29-30. PubMed ID: 6555812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A brief guide to writing better test questions.
    Braddom CL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1997; 76(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 9431271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Writing a multiple-choice test question.
    Terry MA
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1992 Jan; 92(1):112-4, 123. PubMed ID: 1559853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Planning and writing academic essays.
    Lowry M
    Nurs Stand; 1995 Feb 22-28; 9(22):25-7. PubMed ID: 7703127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A strategy for reading and responding to multiple choice test items.
    Helm P
    Imprint; 1979 Sep; 26(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 256887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A strategy for reading and responding to multiple choice test items.
    Helm P
    Imprint; 1978 Oct; 25(3):52-3. PubMed ID: 250493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Item modelling procedure for constructing content-equivalent multiple choice questions.
    LaDuca A; Staples WI; Templeton B; Holzman GB
    Med Educ; 1986 Jan; 20(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 3951382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.